Scovill Manufacturing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 25, 194242 N.L.R.B. 892 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of SCOVILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and INTERNA- TIONAL UNION OF MINE, MILL AND SMELTER WORKERS, C. I O. In the Matter of SCOVILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and METAL POLISHERS, BUFFERS, PLATERS & HELPERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL #35, A. F. OF L. In the Matter of SCOVILL MFG Co (WATERVILLE DIV) and INTERNA- TIONAL ASSN OF MACHINISTS, LODGE 1335 Cases Nos R-4021, R-4022, and R-4023, ,respectively -Decided July 05, 1942 Jurisdiction : brass mill products manufacturing and fabricating industry Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question re- fusal to accord petitioner recognition, labor oiganization not desiring to par- ticipate in election in one of plants, among the employees of which it lacked substantial representation, excluded from ballot in election directed in that plant, elections necessary Unit Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : separate elections directed among employees of two plants of Company to ascertain desires of employees, where parties stipulated that plants constituted separate appropriate units, but that Board might find them to constitute a single appropriate unit in the event industrial union won elections in both plants Mr Frederick Livingston, for the Board Mr. Francis T. Reeves, of Waterbury, Conn, for the Company Mr Nathan Witt, of New York City, for the Smelter Workers. Mr Jerome Y. Sturm, of New York City, for the Machinists Mr. Charles W Schneider, of counsel to the Board. DECISION DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petitions duly filed by International Union of Mine; Mill, and Smelter Workers, C I O , herein called the Smelter Workers; Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers & Helpers International Union, Local #35, A F. of L, herein called the Metal Polishers; and Inter- 42 N L R B, No 171 892 SCOVILL. MANUFACTURING COMPANY 893 national Association of Machinists, Lodge 1335, herein called the Machinists, alleging that questions affecting commerce had arisen con- cerning the representation of employees of Scovill Manufacturing Company, Waterbury and Waterville, Connecticut, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an ap- propriate hearing upon due notice before Charles E Persons, Tiial Examiner Said hearing was held at Waterbury, Connecticut, on July 7, 1942 The Board, the Company, the Smelter Workers, and the Machinists appeared and participated.' All parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues. The Trial Examin- er's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following • FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Scovill Manufacturing Company is a Connecticut corporation en- gaged' in the manufacture of brass mill products and brass and sheet tube rod and wire forms, and the fabi ication of i elated products The Company's principal office is located in Waterbury, Connecticut It operates factories in the States of Connecticut, Wisconsin, Michigan, and New York, and also in Canada and England The Company maintains warehouses and branch-offices in various cities throughout the. United States The present proceedings involve two plants located at Waterbury and Waterville, Connecticut The principal raw materials used at the Waterbury and Waterville plants are copper, zinc, lead, tin, nickel, aluminum, and steel During the period from December 1, 1941, through June 1, 1942, the Company purchased 66,500,000 pounds, of 96 percent of such raw materials from sources outside the State of Con- necticut, for use at the Waterbury and Waterville plants During the same period the Company sold from the Waterbury and Waterville plants, finished products valued at $30,800,000, 93 percent of which was shipped to destinations outside the State of Connecticut The Company concedes that it is engaged in commerce within the mean- ing of the National Labor Relations Act. 1 The Metal Polishers , and Scovill Mechanics Union, Inc, although served with due notice, did not appear at the hearing 894 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD II THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Inteinational Unlon'of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, admitting to membership employees of the Company International Association of Machinists, Lodge 1335, is a labor oi- ganization affiliated with the Ameiican Fedeiation of Labor, ad- mitting to membership employees of the Company III THE QUESTIONS CONCERNING REPRESENTATION On April 18, 1942, the Smelter Wrorkeis requested recognition as exclusive baigainmg repiesentative of the employees of theWaterbuiy and 11Tatelville plants On or about April 23, 1942, the Company declined to accoid the Smelter Workers such recognition A n epoi t of the Regional Director, introduced into evidence at the hearing, indicates that each of the labor oigannzations involved lepre- sents a substantial number of employees within the unit which it alleges to be appropriate 2 We find that questions affecting commerce have arisen concerning the iepiesentation of employees of the Company within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act IV THE APPROPRIATE UNIT, THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES The parties stipulated that the Company's employees at its Water- buiy and Waterville plants in the working groups defined below consti- tute two separate units appropriate for the puiposes of collective bar- gaining, but that in the event the Smeltei,Workeis should win elections 2 The Smelter Workers submitted to the Regional Director 3,341 authorization-applica- tion cards dated as follouus 1 during 1936, 38 during 1938, 232 during 1939, 110 during 1940, 1,641 during 1941, 1,032 duung 1912, and 287 undated Of the 3,341 cards, 3,140 bore apparently genuine original »gnatuies, 1,984 of the signatures nere the names of persons on the Company's May 10, 1942, pay roll in the unit requested by the Smelter worker s Of these signatures, 1;576 were names appearing on the Waterbury plant pay roll listing 6,941 employees within the Smelter Workers unit, 108 appeared on the Waterville plant pay loll, listing 457 such employees The Machim'ts submitted to the Regional Director 33 bargaining-authorization cards dated duung May 1942 IS applications for membership, an undated petition containing 60 signatures authorising the Machinists to represent the signatories for collective bargaining purposes, and the membership roster and dues records of the Metal Polishers containing 70 names The application cards were dated as tollows 4 duung 1933, 1 during 1934, 2 during 1936, 4 during 1937, and 7 undated All the signatures appealed to be genuine-originals, 96 of the said signatures and 25 of the names ippenrng on the membership roster and dues iecoids were the n ames of persons on the Watersille, May 10, 1942, pay loll in the unit requested by the Machinists Ten of the signatures appear on the May 10 pay roll at the Waterbury plant The record indicates that the Metal Polishers has waived to the Machinists its jurisdiction ok ei employees in the A\ aterville plant Although the Metal Polishers did not appear, it submitted to the Regional Director its membership iostei and dues record containing 70 names, 12 of the navies on the roster and dues record are the names of metal polishers, buffets, platers, helpeis and assistants, on the Waterbury plants May 10 pay roll listing 98 such employees - This is the unit alleged in the Metal Polishers' petition to be appropriate SCOVILL MANUFACTURING COMPANY 895 in both plants the Board may find that the two plants constitute a single appropriate unit We find that the employees at the Waterbury and Waterville plants could function elthei as separate bargaining units or as a single bar- gaining unit We shall, therefore, make no final determination of the unit at this time but shall direct that the questions concerning representation which have arisen be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot among the employees in the respective plants who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding thefldate of the Direction of Elections herein, subject to the limitations and additions set for th in the Dii ection In accordance with' stipulations of the parties, the respective voting groups shall be as follows: (1) all hourly paid and piece-work production and maintenance employees at the Waterbury plant, including truck drivers and truck mechanics, laboratory assistants in the development, finishing, plating, and lac- quer departments, but excluding office and clerical employees, time- keepers, watchmen; executives, foremen, assistant foremen, forel'adies, and all others in supervisory capacities, all employees in the advanced training course, general training course, hospital, administrative re- seai ch, chemists and test department, checkers and clerks in the ti af- fic office department, woiking supervisors, draftsmen and tracers, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by the Smelter Workers,3 and (2) among all hourly paid and piece-work production and maintenance employees at the Waterville plant, including truck di ivers and truck mechanics. and supervisory instructors,4 but exclud- ing office and clerical employees, timekeepers, watchmen, executives, foremen, assistant foremen, foreladres, and all others in supervisory capacities, and Charles Campi, a clerical employee, to determine whethet they desire to be represented by the Smelter Workers, by the Machinists, of by neither Upon the results of these elections will depend in part the appropriate unit or units -If a majority in each plant chooses the Smelter Workers the two plants together will con- stitute one appropriate unit If the plants select different bargaining representatives they shall constitute separate appropriate units Since the Metal Polishers did not appear at the hearing its petition will be dismissed 3 The M ichinists apparently do not desire to participate in the election to be held among the Wateibuiv employees Their shoeing of representation at that plant is less than 1 percent We accordingly omit then name fi om the ballot 4 These instructors 'ire olde mechanics who instruct the new and less experienced men They have no disciplinary authority 896 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- tions Act, 49 Stat 449, and pursuant to Article III, Sections 8 and 9, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as pact of the investigation to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Scovill Manufac- turing Company, Waterbury and Waterville, Connecticut, elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of'this Direction of Elections, under. the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Second Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations Among 1 All hourly paid and piece ;work production and maintenance employees at the Waterbury, Connecticut, plant of the Company, who were employed during the pay-io11 period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Elections, including truck drivers and truck mechanics, laboratory assistants in the development, finishing, plat- ing, and lacquer departments, and any such employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding office and clerical employees, time- keepers, watchmen, executives, foremen, assistant foremen, foreladies, and all others in supervisory capacities, all employees in the advanced training course, general training course, hospital, administrative re- search, chemists and test department, checkers and clerks in the traf- fic office department, working supervisors, draftsmen and tracers, and any who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, for the purposes of collective bargaining. 2 Among all hourly paid and piece-work production and mainte- nance employees of the Waterville, Connecticut, plant of the Com- pany, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Electrons, including truck-, drivers and truck mechanics, supervisory instructors, and any such employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training SCOVZLL MANUFACT'UR'ING COMPANY 897 of the United States, or temporarily laid off, but excluding office and clerical employees, timekeepers, watchmen, executives, foremen, assist- ant foremen, foreladies, and all otheis in supervisory capacities, Charles Campi, a clerical employee, and any who have since quit or been discharged for cause, to determine whether they desire to be represented by International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Work- ers, affiliated with the Congiess of Industrial Organizations, or by International Association of Machinists, Lodge 1335, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bar- gaining, or by neither. ORDER Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact and the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board, hereby orders' that the petition for investigation and certification of representatives of employees of Scovill Manufacturing Company, Waterbury, Con- necticut, filed by Metal Polishers, Buffers, Platers & Helpers Inter- national Union, Local #35, A. F. of L, be, and it hereby is, dismissed. MR. GERARD D. REILLY took no part in the consideration of the above Decision, Direction of Elections and Order. i 472814-42-vol 42-57 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation