Saul B.,1 Complainant,v.Mark Green, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 10, 2018
0120180629 (E.E.O.C. May. 10, 2018)

0120180629

05-10-2018

Saul B.,1 Complainant, v. Mark Green, Administrator, Agency for International Development, Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Saul B.,1

Complainant,

v.

Mark Green,

Administrator,

Agency for International Development,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120180629

Agency No. OCRD-011-17-F

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

By Notice of Appeal emailed on December 4, 2017, Complainant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) from a final Agency decision (FAD) dated October 18, 2017, concerning his equal employment opportunity (EEO) complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Complainant emailed his appeal on December 4, 2017, to a Program Assistant with EEOC's Washington Field Office. On the same day, the Program Assistant forwarded the email to this office, which handles appeals. Therein, Complainant wrote that per their telephone conversation he was checking to see if the appeal he sent via DHL from Tanzania made it to the proper office section, which he assumed would be the one that handles appeals. He wrote that DHL apparently delivered the package to the wrong address on November 9, 2017, which caused a delay, and he received information on December 4, 2018, that the package was delivered to an identified address (our full street address).

To the above email Complainant attached a scanned copy of his Notice of Appeal dated October 30, 2017. He also attached his scanned appeal statement dated October 30, 2017, addressed to this office's post office box. Therein, he stated that he received the FAD on October 18, 2017. This is consistent with the Agency's representation on the face of the October 18, 2017 FAD that it emailed the FAD to Complainant's attorney in the United Republic of Tanzania.

We have no record of receipt of any appeal documents by Complainant other than what he sent via email on December 4, 2017. A review of the FAD reveals that the Agency properly advised Complainant that he had thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of its final decision to file his appeal with the Commission. He filed his appeal beyond this time limit. Complainant submits no tracking documentation from DHL or other documentary evidence of a prior mailing of his appeal. Accordingly, Complainant has not offered adequate justification for an extension of the applicable time limit for filing his appeal.

Complainant's December 4, 2017 appeal is hereby dismissed. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(c).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0617)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Complainant's request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The agency's request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC's Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 10, 2018

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120180629

3

0120180629