Sarah M. Sharp, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Midwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 25, 2000
01994974 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 25, 2000)

01994974

10-25-2000

Sarah M. Sharp, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Midwest Area), Agency.


Sarah M. Sharp v. United States Postal Service

01994974

October 25, 2000

.

Sarah M. Sharp,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Midwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01994974

Agency No. 1-I-632-0005-99

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an

agency's final decision dated April 20, 1999 dismissing her complaint

of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.<1> In her complaint, complainant alleged that

she was subjected to discrimination on the basis of physical disability

(osteoarthritis) when on October 1, 2, and 9, 1998 she was sent home while

on temporary light duty while employees on limited duty and permanent

light duty were permitted to work.

The agency dismissed complainant's claim pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) contending that the claim had previously been

decided by the agency in Complaint No. 1-I-632-1040-96. EEOC Regulation

29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides that an agency may dismiss a

matter that is pending before or has been decided by the agency or

the Commission. The Commission has held that the complaint must set

forth matters identical to the prior complaint in order for dismissal

to be warranted. See Scott v. Department of the Interior,

EEOC Request No. 05970038(April 14, 1999). The Commission has

consistently held that in order for a complaint to be dismissed as

identical, the elements of the complaint must be identical to the elements

of the prior complaint in time, place, incident, and parties. See Jackson

v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. 01955890 (April 5,

1996).

Upon review of Complaint No. 1-I-632-1040-96, including an EEOC

Administrative Judge's decision (EEOC Hearing No. 280-97-4319X), the

appellate decision (EEOC Appeal No. 01991542), and the decision on

complainant's request to reconsider (EEOC Request No. 05A00668), the

Commission finds that, although complainant has raised a claim involving

a similar issue, whether a light duty employee has the same entitlement

to duty hours as a limited duty employee, the claim raised in Complaint

No. 1-I-632-1040-96 was that complainant's work hours were reduced and

her light duty schedule changed in 1996. In the instant complaint,

she claims that limited duty and permanent light duty employees were

afforded the opportunity to work while she was sent home in 1998. Thus,

the complaint does not state the same claim that either the agency or

the Commission has previously decided, and dismissal was improper.

Accordingly we reverse the agency's final decision and remand the

complaint for further processing in accordance with the ORDER below

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claim within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 25, 2000

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.