Sandra Weinstein, Complainant,v.William M. Daley, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 12, 2000
01a02568 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 12, 2000)

01a02568

04-12-2000

Sandra Weinstein, Complainant, v. William M. Daley, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.


Sandra Weinstein, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A02568

) Agency No. 99-63-00884D

William M. Daley, )

Secretary, )

Department of Commerce, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

The instant matter is being processed following the implementation of

a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered into by the agency, the

Bureau of the Census, and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission.<1> The MOU was entered into in order to process complaints

arising from the 2000 Decennial Census more effectively and efficiently.

Pursuant to the MOU, individuals file their complaints directly with

the Commission. The Commission, through its Washington, D.C. Field

Office, then conducts an early assessment of complaints and neutral

evaluation of cases. The Washington, D.C. Field Office of the Commission

establishes a record of the complaint by obtaining an affidavit from the

complainant and by contacting an agency official to obtain the necessary

information on the complaint. Based on the record established by the

Washington, D.C. Field Office, the Washington, D.C. Field Office will:

(1) notify the agency that the individual has elected not to file a

formal complaint; (2) issue a decision dismissing the complaint and

notify the complainant or his or her right to appeal the decision to

the Office of Federal Operations; (3) conduct settlement negotiations;

or (4) notify the complainant that the complaint has been accepted and

forward the complaint to the agency for further investigation.

The agency issued a decision dated August 23, 1999, dismissing a

portion of complainant's complaint filed on April 5, 1999 (agency

number 99-63-0398D) and advising complainant to contact an EEO

Counselor on several other claims. Complainant filed an appeal with the

Commission regarding the dismissed claims, which was assigned EEOC Appeal

No. 01997218. By letter dated December 7, 1999, the Commission informed

the agency that on November 9, 1999, revised regulations went into effect

which provided that where an agency believes that some but not all of

the claims in a complaint should be dismissed, the agency shall notify

the complainant in writing of its determination, the rationale for that

determination and that those claims will not be investigated, and shall

place a copy of the notice in the investigative file. The Commission

informed the agency that a determination not to investigate certain claims

is reviewable by an administrative judge if a hearing is requested on the

remainder of the complaint, but is not appealable until final action is

taken on the remainder of the complaint. The Commission noted that the

appeal in EEOC Appeal No. 01997218 involved the partial of dismissal of

claims from a complaint and consequently remanded those claims to the

agency for consolidation with the remainder of the complaint.

Subsequent to the agency's August 23, 1999 decision, complainant contacted

an EEO Counselor regarding those claims which were not dismissed from

her April 5, 1999 complaint. Complainant then filed another complaint

dated October 11, 1999, concerning those claims, which were previously

raised in the April 5, 1999 complaint. The Washington, D.C. Field Office

of the Commission issued a decision dated January 4, 2000, dismissing

those claims for failing to state a claim.

Initially, the Commission finds that the agency should have not required

complainant to file a new formal complaint regarding those claims

previously raised in the April 5, 1999 complaint. The claims presently

pending on appeal are part of the April 5, 1999 complaint, of which the

remainder has been remanded to the agency in EEOC Appeal No. 01997218.

In order to correct the fragmentation of the subject April 5, 1999

complaint, we shall vacate the instant decision and remand the matter

to the agency for consolidation with those claims previously remanded

in EEOC Appeal No. 01997218. Thereafter, the agency shall process both

sets of claims as one complaint in accordance with the Order below.

See Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (199) (to be codified as 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(b)).

ORDER

The agency shall consolidate the instant matter with the other claims

raised in the subject April 5, 1999 complaint, which were previously

remanded in EEOC Appeal No. 01997218. The agency shall acknowledge to the

complainant that it has received the remanded claims and consolidated them

with the remainder of the claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. Thereafter, the agency shall process

all the claims in accordance with 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108).

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment and notice of

consolidation must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced

below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The complainant also has

the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the

Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition

for enforcement. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. ��1614.407, 1614.408),

and 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the

right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance

with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action."

29 C.F.R. ��1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or

a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline

stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant

files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,

including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R0400)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 12, 2000

DATE

Carlton

M.

Hadden,

Acting

Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_____________________ _________________________ Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.