Sandra Q. Oubre, Complainant,v.Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 14, 2000
01996078 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 14, 2000)

01996078

03-14-2000

Sandra Q. Oubre, Complainant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Sandra Q. Oubre, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01996078

) Agency No. 98-3471

Togo D. West, Jr., )

Secretary, )

Department of Veterans Affairs, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On July 30, 1999, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission

from a final agency decision (FAD) dated June 29, 1999, pertaining to her

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et

seq.<1> In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected

to discrimination on the basis of race (African American) when:

March 1997 - demotion;

March 1997 - March 1998 - Performance Appraisal; and

May 1998 - Harassment.

The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to file a timely formal

complaint. Specifically, the agency found that complainant received her

notice-of-right-to-file-a-complaint on September 14, 1998, but failed to

file her formal complaint until September 30, 1998. The agency discounted

complainant's argument that she mailed the complaint on September 23,

1998, by stating that the envelope in which the complaint was mailed had a

postmark of September 30, 1998. Alternatively, the agency dismissed claim

(1) for failure to state a claim, because complainant was never actually

demoted, and dismissed claims (2) and (3) for untimely counselor contact.

With regard to claims (2) and (3), the agency found that complainant

raised the claims in her formal complaint, but not during counseling.

Complainant provided no argument on appeal.

The record includes a copy of the notice-of-right-to-file-a-complaint,

dated September 10, 1998. A certified-return-receipt-card shows that

complainant received the notice on September 14, 1998. The record also

contains a copy of the formal complaint, dated September 23, 1998, and

a copy of the envelope in which it was mailed, postmarked September 30,

1998.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106(b) requires the filing of a

written complaint with an appropriate agency official within fifteen

(15) calendar days after the date of receipt of the notice of the right

to file a formal complaint. A complaint is timely if it is postmarked

or received before the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified as 29 C.F.R. �

1614.604(b)). Complaints not filed within fifteen days of receipt of

the notice must be dismissed unless waiver, tolling, or equity dictates

otherwise. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and

hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2)).

The record in this case indicates that complainant received the notice on

September 14, 1998, and that the notice informed complainant that she had

fifteen days from the date of its receipt to file a formal complaint.

The record further reflects that complainant did not file a formal

complaint within fifteen days, but instead filed the formal complaint

on Wednesday, September 30, 1998. Complainant has failed to present

adequate justification for extending the filing period. Accordingly,

the agency's dismissal of the entire complaint for failure to timely

file a formal complaint is AFFIRMED.<2>

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

March 14, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant 1On November 9, 1999, revised

regulations governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process

went into effect. These regulations apply to all federal sector

EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative process.

Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations found

at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.

2Since we are affirming the agency's dismissal of the entire complaint on

the grounds of untimeliness, we will not address the agency's alternative

grounds for dismissal, i.e., that claim (1) fails to state a claim,

and the remaining claims were not timely raised with an EEO counselor.