Sanders et al.Download PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesFeb 26, 200208228132 (B.P.A.I. Feb. 26, 2002) Copy Citation The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 31 Filed by: Interference Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed: Washington, D.C. 20231 26 February 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE FAXED BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES FEB 2 6 2002 IRA SANDERS and CHRISTOPHER M. SHAARI, PAT. & TPA. OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APMALS AND INTERFERENCES Junior Party, (Patent 5,766,605), V. K. ROGER AOKI, MICHAEL W. GRAYSTON, STEVEN R CARLSON and JUDITH M. LEON, Senior Party, (Application 08/627,118). Patent Interference No. 104,688 Before: SCHAFER, LEE and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT UNDER 37 CFR § 1.662(a) Contingent on the Grant of the parties' Joint Preliminary Motion 1, Sanders has conceded priority as to the subject matter of Count 2. Paper 17. Also contingent on the granting of Joint Preliminary Motion 1, Aoki concedes priority as to the subject matter of Count 3. Paper 18. Joint Preliminary Motion I was granted. Paper 29. Accordingly, the concessions of priority are construed as a request for entry of adverse judgment under 3 7 CFR § 1.667(a). Accordingly, it is-- ORDERED that judgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 2 (Paper 30, p. 1) is awarded against the junior party, IRA SANDERS and CHRISTOPHER M. SHAARI; FURTHER ORDERED that junior party, IPA SANDERS and CHRISTOPHER M. SHAARI, is not entitled to a patent containing claims I and 13-18 (corresponding to Count 2) of Patent 5,766,605; FURTHER ORDERED thatjudgment on priority as to the subject matter of Count 3 (Paper 30, p. 2) is awarded against senior party, K. ROGERAOKI, MICHAEL W. GRAYSTON, STEVEN R. CARLSON and JUDITH M. LEON; FURTHER ORDERED that senior party, K. ROGER AOKI, MICHAEL W. GRAYSTON, STEVEN R. CARLSON and JUDITH M. LEON, is not entitled to a patent containing claims 60-71 (corresponding to Count 3) of Application 08/627,118; FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this judgment be made of record in Application 08/627,118 and Patent 5,766,605; and FURTHER ORDERED that if there is any settlement agreement which has not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR. § 1.661. 1ICHARD E. SCHAFER Administrative Patent Judge BOARD OF PATENT "SON LEE APPEALS AND dministrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES MICHAEL P. TIERNEY Administrative Patent Judge 2 cc (via Fax): Attorney for SANDERS: Richard S. Clark, Esq. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 250 Park Avenue NewYorkN.Y. 10177 Tel: 212-415-0797 Fax: 212-953-7201 Attorney for AOKI: Jerry D. Voight, Esq. FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 700 Hansen Way Palo Alto, CA 94304 Tel: 650-849-6600 Fax: 650-849-6666 3 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation