Sagamore Manufacturing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

May 18, 1942

41 N.L.R.B. 16 (N.L.R.B. 1942)

In the Matter of SAGAMORE MANUFACTURING Co. and TEXTILE
WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA (C. 1. 0.)
In the Matter Of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION ;
BORDER CITY MFG. Co.; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. CO.; ARKWRIGIIT
CORPORATION ; SAGAMORE MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.;
HOWARD ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG.
CO.';. STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and* LOOM
FIXERS UNION LOCAL #6 (A. F. 'T. 0.)
-In the Matter of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION ;
BORDER ; CITY MFG. Co; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. Co.; ARKWRIGIIT
CORPORATION; SAGAMORE MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.;
HOWARD ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG.
Co.; STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and SLASHER
TENDERS LOCAL # 16 (A. F. T. 0.)
In the Matter of FALL RIVER COTTON MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION;
BORDER CITY MFG. Co; RICHARD BORDEN MFG. Co.; ARKWRIGHT
CORPORATION ; SAGAMORE 'MFG. Co.; BERKSHIRE FINE SPINNING CO.;
HOWARD - ARTHUR MFG. CO.; PEPPERELL MFG. Co.; LUTHER MFG.
CO.; STEVENS TEXTILE MFG. CO.; AND BOURNE MILLS and KNOT-
TIERS, DRAWING-IN MACHINE OPERATORS AND WARL' TWISTERS LOCAL
#52 (A-F,T.'O.)
Cases Nos. B-3500 to R-3503, inclusive, respectively
SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION
AND
ORDER
May 18, 1942
Upon petition for rehearing duly filed by Loom Fixers Union
Local #6, Slasher Tenders Local #16, and Knot-Tiers, Drawing-In'
Machine Operators and Warp Twisters Local #52, oral argument
was held before the Board on May 5, 1942. The Loom Fixers, the
Slasher Tenders, the Knot-Tiers, Textile Workers Union of America,
and United Textile Workers of America were represented at, and
participated therein.'
I None of the companies appeared , although served with notice of the argument.
41 N. L. R. B., No. 5.
16
SAGAMORE MANUFACTURING CO. 17
All the contentions advanced at the oral argument were fully con-
sidered in our previous Decision. After review, we are of the opinion
that the considerations urged at the argument confirm our original
findings with respect to the appropriate unit. The petition for
rehearing-is therefore denied.
463SU2-42--vol 41-2