Ruthann Storr, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 13, 2009
0120091701 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 13, 2009)

0120091701

07-13-2009

Ruthann Storr, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Ruthann Storr,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091701

Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated November 6, 2008, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.,

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq., and the Equal Pay Act of 1963, as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 206(d) et seq. In her complaint, complainant alleged that

she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (European),

sex (female), color (White), and age (DOB: December 10, 1941) when:

1. She had been denied higher level pay for performing ramp duties while

a male co-worker was paid more;

2. After sustaining an on-the-job injury in December 2007, complainant

was denied work and forced to use leave without pay;

3. She has been denied privileges afforded to others in that she is not

permitted to park her van by the tent, she is forced to in the lunch room,

and her supervisor raises his voice every time complainant talks to him;

4. On or about August 24, 2008, complainant was told she should think

about retiring, he suggested that she take all of her leave and ask for

LWOP, and he suggested that she rent a room somewhere in Fiji; and

5. Complainant's requests for representation were ignored.

The agency dismissed the complaint noting that complainant had contact

the EEO office on February 19, 2008, regarding events (1) to (3).

That was designated as Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08. Complainant was

provided with a notice of right to file in this matter; however, the

agency indicated that complainant did not file a formal complaint.

Subsequently, complainant contacted the EEO office alleging all the

events indicated above. This new complaint was designated as Agency

No. 1F-921-0033-08. Complainant filed her formal complaint on October 7,

2008, on Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08. Since complainant failed to file

a formal complaint in Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08, the agency believed

that she had abandoned that claim. Further the agency noted that the

remaining events failed to state a claim of harassment. As such, the

agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

Complainant appealed. The agency responded stating it stands on its

dismissal.

Upon review of the record, we find that the agency failed to properly

process complainant's informal matters. The record shows that complainant

had contacted the agency with regard to Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08.

While that matter was within the EEO Office, complainant contacted the

EEO Office regarding additional events on August 28, 2008. Rather than

including the "new" events in Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08, the agency

assigned it a new complaint number, namely, Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08.

The record shows that complainant was provided with a notice of right to

file for Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08 which was mailed on September 24, 2008.

The agency included copies of the return receipt forms indicating that

it was received by complainant on October 2, 2008. The record also

includes a notice of right to file signed by complainant in which the

typed complaint number, Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08, has been crossed out

and written Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08. This notice of right to file is

signed by the EEO counselor on September 24, 2008. The agency failed

to provide evidence that this notice of right to file was mailed to

complainant. Finally, the record shows that complainant file a formal

complaint on October 7, 2008. The formal complaint, like the notice

of right to file, has typed Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08, however, someone

crossed that number out and replaced it with Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08.

The agency asserted that Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08 should be dismissed

for it was previously raised in Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08 but abandoned

by complainant. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

provides that the agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the

same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency

or Commission. Upon review, we find that the agency has not shown that

complainant abandoned the matter raised in Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08.

The agency failed to amend the issues raised by complainant. Instead,

the agency confused the process by issuing a notice of right to sue on

Agency No. 1F-921-0015-08 and at some point changing the number on the

complaint to Agency No. 1F-921-0033-08. Therefore, we find that the

agency dismissal of the complaint was inappropriate.

The agency then looked at the remaining claim of harassment. The agency

dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she

has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Taking the complaints as a

whole, we find that complainant has stated a claim. She indicated that

she was aggrieved regarding the terms and conditions of her employment.

As such, we find that the agency improperly dismissed the complaint for

failure to state a claim.

Accordingly, we reverse the agency's final decision and remand the

complaint for further processing as ordered below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 13, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120091701

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120091701