Russell Y. Zizek Petitioner, v . William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 1, 2000
03a00128 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 1, 2000)

03a00128

11-01-2000

Russell Y. Zizek Petitioner, v . William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Russell Y. Zizek v. USPS

03A00128

November 1, 2000

.

Russell Y. Zizek

Petitioner,

v

.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A00128

MSPB No. CH-0752-99-0667-I-1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On September 5, 2000, Russell Y. Zizak (hereinafter referred to as

petitioner) filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) regarding the Merit Systems Protection Board's (MSPB

or the Board) final decision on his case.

Petitioner, a Supervisor of Vehicle Maintenance filed an appeal with

the MSPB from a final agency decision on his EEO complaint alleging race

and age discrimination regarding his alleged involuntary retirement from

the agency. The MSPB dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction,

finding that petitioner's retirement was not involuntary. The MSPB

did not address petitioner's claims of discrimination and the decision

to dismiss was upheld by the full Board in a decision dated August 4,

2000. The Board did not give petitioner appeal rights to the Commission

and there is no indication that the agency has complied with 29 C.F.R. �

1614.302(b).<1>

When the MSPB has denied jurisdiction in such matters, the Commission

has held that there is little point in continuing to view the matter as

a "mixed case" as defined by 29 C.F.R. �1614.302(a). Thus, the case

will be considered a "non-mixed" matter and processed accordingly.

See generally Schmitt v. Department of Transportation, EEOC Appeal

No. 01902126 (July 9, 1990); Phillips v. Department of the Army, EEOC

Request No. 05900883 (October 12, 1990); 29 C.F.R. �1614.302(c)(2)(I)

and (ii). Petition No. 03A00111 hereby is administratively closed, and

the matter is referred to the agency for further processing as outlined

below.

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Petitioner is advised that by operation of 29 C.F.R. �1614.302(c)(2)(ii),

the agency is required to process the allegation of discrimination as a

"non-mixed" matter pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.109 et seq. The agency

shall acknowledge to the petitioner that it has received the remanded

matter within thirty (30) days of the date this decision becomes final.

The agency shall issue to the petitioner a copy of the investigative file

and also shall notify the petitioner of the right to a hearing before an

EEOC Administrative Judge within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the petitioner requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of the petitioner's request. Petitioner has the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court, based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that this decision is received.

STATEMENT OF PETITIONER'S RIGHTS

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

November 1, 2000

Date

Carlton

M.

Hadden,

Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to petitioner, petitioner's representative

(if applicable), the agency, and MSPB on:

________________ ____________________________

Date 1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing

the EEOC's federal sector complaint process went into effect. These

regulations apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any

stage in the administrative process. The regulations, as amended,

may be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.