Russell C.,1 Complainant,v.Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 29, 2016
0120161034 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 29, 2016)

0120161034

04-29-2016

Russell C.,1 Complainant, v. Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Russell C.,1

Complainant,

v.

Robert McDonald,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120161034

Agency No. 200303312015104080

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated December 21, 2015, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Veterans Claims Examiner at the Agency's VARO facility in St. Louis, Missouri.

On October 21, 2015, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the basis of race (African-American) when: (1) in May 2015, MB, a Veterans Claims Examiner Supervisor, called Complainant on his personal cell phone on numerous occasions after hours to discuss work-related matters; (2) on June 3, 2015, MB called Complainant's home at 6:05 a.m., woke up his wife, and yelled at her accusing Complainant of being absent without leave, although his tour of duty had not begun; (3) on June 3, 2015, Complainant was not selected for the position of Education Compliance Survey Specialist, GS- 9/10, Vacancy Announcement No. 331-15-TWH-1355470-BU; (4) on June 9, 2015, MB asked Complainant for personal medical information before he would allow him to return to duty; and (5) on June 10, 2015, Complainant learned he was not selected for the position of Veterans Service Representative, GS-0996-7, Vacancy Announcement No. 331-2833-15-TWH-12955610-BU.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106, which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving the notice of the right to do so.

The record discloses that Complainant received the notice of right to file a formal complaint on October 1, 2015. Although the notice indicated that Complainant had to file a formal complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt, Complainant did not file his formal complaint until October 21, 2015, which is beyond the limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has not offered adequate justification to warrant an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint. Contrary to Complainant's assertions, he need not prove his case before filing a formal complaint. Rather, it is during the investigative stage that information and evidence regarding the accepted claims is gathered. Complainant argues that he was waiting for information concerning his case to be provided to him by Human Resources. However, any delays in receiving this information does not excuse an untimely EEO counselor contact. The Commission has consistently held that the utilization of agency procedures, union grievances, and other remedial processes does not toll the time limit for contacting an EEO Counselor. See Ellis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01992093 (November 29, 2000).

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0815)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 29, 2016

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120161034

4

0120161034