Ruby Ann Gomez, Complainant,v.Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 29, 2010
0120102194 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 29, 2010)

0120102194

06-29-2010

Ruby Ann Gomez, Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.


Ruby Ann Gomez,

Complainant,

v.

Gary Locke,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

(Bureau of the Census),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120102194

Agency No. 10-63-00407D

DECISION

Upon review, we find that the Agency's decision dated March 25, 2010,

dismissing Complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim is proper

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1). The Agency's decision dismissing

the complaint is AFFIRMED.

BACKGROUND

In her complaint, filed on March 4, 2010, Complainant, an Assistant

Manager of Recruiting at the Agency's Corpus Christi Local Census

Office, alleged that she was subjected to harassment and retaliation for

submitting complaints to an identified Area/Regional Manager. Complaint

File (COM), at 7. In its decision, the Agency stated that Complainant

failed to state a claim within the purview of the EEO complaint process

since she failed to allege retaliation for either participation in, or

opposition to, any protected EEO statute. COM, at 115, 116. The Agency

further stated that its EEO tracking system, EEO track, revealed that

Complainant had no prior EEO activity within the Agency, and, therefore,

Complainant failed to state a claim of retaliation. COM, at 115.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulations prohibit retaliation against an individual for opposing

any practice made lawful by Title VII, EPA, the ADEA, the Rehabilitation

Act, or for participating in any stage of administrative or judicial

proceedings under these statutes. See, 29 C.F.R. � 1614.101(b).

After a review of the record, we find that Complainant alleged no basis

within the purview of the regulations. On appeal, Complainant contends

that her previously submitted complaints concerning management's abuse of

authority and preferential treatment to the Area Manager is a protected

activity under the Whistleblower Protection Act. However, we note that

violation of the Whistleblower Protection Act is not within the purview

of the EEO regulations; thus, it does not state a claim.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

6/29/10

__________________

Date

2

0120102194

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013