Rose M. Hannah, Complainant,v.F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 11, 2000
01994336 (E.E.O.C. May. 11, 2000)

01994336

05-11-2000

Rose M. Hannah, Complainant, v. F. Whitten Peters, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


Rose M. Hannah, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01994336

) Agency No. AL900990591

F. Whitten Peters, )

Acting Secretary, )

Department of the Air Force, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to

be codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1)), for failure to state a claim.<1> Complainant alleged

that she was discriminated against and harassed on the bases of race and

color (Black), and in reprisal for involvement in the EEO process when:

In December 1998, management officials advised [a named Colonel] of the

27th Support Group Command that he should not discuss her EEO complaints

with her due to potential conflicts of interest;

On January 3, 1999, a Training and Curriculum Specialist disclosed

information relating to previous mediation attempts;

In January and February 1999, disciplinary action was contemplated

against her for falsification of her December 24, 1998 time card;

On February 4, 1999, management officials advised her to file a grievance

over the alleged disclosure of information relating to prior mediation

attempts rather than filing a discrimination complaint; and

On February 10, 1999, a Training and Curriculum Specialist made a racial

comment to the effect that �we got rid of one, now one more.�

In the instant complaint, we find that complainant failed to show that

she suffered harm with respect to the terms, conditions or privileges of

her employment as a result of the incidents identified. Standing alone,

each of complainant's claims fails to state a claim, and even when viewed

together and in a light most favorable to complainant, the claims are

insufficiently severe to establish a hostile work environment claim.

Consequently, complainant's complaint was properly dismissed for failure

to state a claim.<2> To the extent complainant's claims concern what

she considers improper handling of her EEO complaints, we remind the

agency that when claims of improper processing are raised, the complainant

should be referred to the agency official responsible for the quality of

complaints processing, and the agency should earnestly attempt to resolve

any dissatisfaction with the complaints process as early and expeditiously

as possible. EEO-MD 110 (5-25), as revised, November 9, 1999.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

May 11, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,

may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2The agency dismissed all of complainant's claims under29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1), for failure to state a claim and, alternatively,

dismissed claim (3) as a proposal to take a personnel action or other

preliminary step to taking a personnel action. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644,

37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(5)). As we affirm the agency's decision under 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1), we do not address the agency's alternative basis for

dismissal of claim (3).