Ronald K. Anderson, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 16, 2011
0120111338 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 16, 2011)

0120111338

06-16-2011

Ronald K. Anderson, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.




Ronald K. Anderson,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111338

Agency No. 1H302001811

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

Agency's decision dated December 22, 2010, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §

791 et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds

that Complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as

a Mail Processor at the Agency’s North Metro P&DC facility in Duluth,

Georgia. On November 30, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint

alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases

of disability (Back) and age (47) when in January 2010 his supervisor

requested his medical information without giving him something in writing

stating that the Agency had a right to the information; and in May 2010

he was sent to the hand stamp table without being issued a 2499 form –

Offer of Modified Assignment.1

The Agency dismissed the matter for failure to contact an EEO counselor

in a timely manner. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred in

May 2010, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor

until October 5, 2010, which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation

period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or

evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO

Counselor contact. In support of its position, the Agency included an

affidavit from a HR Specialist indicating that EEO posters are posted

at the facility where Complainant is employed.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 16, 2011

__________________

Date

1 Complainant also raised a claim of disability based discrimination. That

claim is being held in abeyance pending the outcome of the McConnell

v.USPS class action complaint.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

01-0111338

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111338