Robert R. Castro, Complainant,v.Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 23, 2006
01A63004 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 23, 2006)

01A63004

08-23-2006

Robert R. Castro, Complainant, v. Dr. Donald C. Winter, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Robert R. Castro,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Donald C. Winter,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A63004

Agency No. 054523A01815

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated March 16, 2006, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint

was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the bases of national origin (Hispanic) and

age (D.O.B. 12/20/43) when:

1. on August 8, 2005, his supervisor (national origin and age

unknown) asked him why he was in the office and not on the deck

plates.

The Commission finds that complainant fails to state a claim under the EEOC

regulations because he failed to show that he was subjected to unwelcome

verbal or physical conduct involving his protected classes, that the

harassment complained of was based on his statutorily protected classes,

and that the harassment had the purpose or effect of unreasonably

interfering with his work performance and/or creating an intimidating,

hostile, or offensive work environment. See McCleod v. Social Security

Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01963810 (August 5, 1999) (citing Henson v.

City of Dundee, 682 F.2d 897 (11th Cir. 1982). Nor has he shown he

suffered a harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air

Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Accordingly, the

agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case

if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29

C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and

arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C.

20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider

shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of

the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604.

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other

party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in

very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or

department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action

will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within

the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil

Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 23, 2006

__________________

Date