Robert P. Adams, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Capital Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 18, 2011
0120111173 (E.E.O.C. May. 18, 2011)

0120111173

05-18-2011

Robert P. Adams, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Capital Metro Area), Agency.




Robert P. Adams,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Capital Metro Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120111173

Agency No. 1K-291-0021-10

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated November 8, 2010, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Upon review, the

Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was improperly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Mail Handler at the Agency’s Processing and Distribution Center in

West Columbia, South Carolina. On October 14, 2010, Complainant filed a

formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination

on the bases of disability, age (over 40), and in reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity when on June 28, 2010, in conjunction with his

on-the-job injury, he was taken off his bid assignment, required to

provide medical documentation, and subsequently provided limited duty

outside his bid assignment.

On November 8, 2010, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing

the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to

state a claim. The Agency determined that there was no evidence that

Complainant was subjected to any adverse action or that he was denied any

entitlement in relation to a term, condition or privilege of employment

as a result of the

incidents he alleged. As a result, the Agency dismissed the complaint

for failure to state a claim.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission's regulation at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) permits an

agency to dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted in the EEO process. An agency must, however,

accept a complaint from any “aggrieved” employee (or applicant) who

alleges that she has been discriminated against because of race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, age, disabling condition or reprisal.

29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case

precedent has long defined an aggrieved employee as one who suffers a

present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of

employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr.21, 1994).

Further, the Commission has a policy of considering reprisal claims

with a broad view of coverage. See Carroll v. Dep’t of the Army,

EEOC Request No. 05970939 (Apr. 4, 2000). Under Commission policy,

claimed retaliatory actions which can be challenged are not restricted

to those which affect a term or condition of employment. Rather,

a complainant is protected from any discrimination that is reasonably

likely to deter protected activity. See EEOC Compliance Manual Section 8,

“Retaliation,” No. 915.003 (May 20, 1998), at 8-15; see also Carroll.

Upon review, the Commission finds that the Agency improperly dismissed

the instant complaint. Complainant has established that he is aggrieved

in this matter by alleging an injury or harm to a term, condition, or

privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Specifically,

he has alleged that the Agency sent him home, moved him off of his

bid assignment, and changed his work hours. As such, the complaint

states a viable claim under EEOC regulations. See Diaz v. Dep't of the

Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr.21, 1994). Accordingly, the

Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is REVERSED.

The complaint is hereby REMANDED to the Agency for further processing

in accordance with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0610)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. § 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue

to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the

Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency

shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of

Complainant’s request.

A copy of the Agency’s letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See

29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Nov. 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and

the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the

paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 18, 2011

Date

2

0120111173

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120111173