Robert M. Peterson, Complainant,v.Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 24, 2000
01a00337 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 24, 2000)

01a00337

04-24-2000

Robert M. Peterson, Complainant, v. Aida Alvarez, Administrator, Small Business Administration, Agency.


Robert M. Peterson, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01A00337

) Agency No. 09-99-040

Aida Alvarez, )

Administrator, )

Small Business Administration, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On September 30, 1999, the agency issued a final decision dismissing the

above entitle matter for failure to state a claim and for raising issued

that have been previously decided by the agency or the Commission. Upon

review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint is ripe

for dismissal pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be

codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(1)).<1> Complainant alleged that he was discriminated

against on the bases of reprisal (prior EEO activity) and disability

(mental) when:

On December 11, 1998, complainant became aware that the SBA forwarded

his email to the U.S. Department of Labor (OWCP), as evidence that

complainant could perform light duty;

The SBA conducted an investigation as to complainant's eligibility to

receive worker's compensation benefits after complainant wrote to his

Congressman;

On December 23, 1998, complainant became aware that the SBE contracted

with the United States Investigative Service to conduct an investigation

of former SBA employees receiving federal worker's compensation benefits

from OWCP without delegation of authority from OWCP;

SBA failed to provide complainant a copy of the findings of the

investigation conducted in claim three despite his request for a copy

of the results;

Complainant's requests for Freedom of Information Act/ Privacy Act

(FOIA) on October 24, 1998, November 4, 8, 21, 24, 29, 30, 1998, and

December 5, 1998 were not received by complainant until December 11,

1998. Furthermore, the SBA did not mail other documents in your FOIA

request until February 11, 1999; and

The SBA requested a second medical opinion to determine if complainant

was eligible to return to work or light duty.

On appeal, no persuasive arguments or evidence have been presented

regarding whether complainant has stated a claim, i.e., to show that

complainant was injured by the incident raised. Accordingly, the agency's

final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.<2>

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court

appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you

to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security.

See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �

2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request

is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an

attorney does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 24, 2000

________________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's

federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations

apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in

the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where

applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,

may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2Since the Commission has dismissed the present complainant in its

entirety for failure to state a claim, the Commission will not address

the agency's alternative ground for dismissal.