Robert L. Dixon, Appellant,v.Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 12, 1999
01990673_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 12, 1999)

01990673_r

10-12-1999

Robert L. Dixon, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Robert L. Dixon, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01990673

) Agency No. ACBWFO9802I0060

Louis Caldera, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Army, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

Upon review, we find that appellant's complaint was properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(b), on the grounds that appellant failed

to contact an EEO Counselor in a timely manner. Appellant alleged that

he was discriminated against when he was denied a quality step increase.

The agency stated that the date of the alleged discrimination was

November 18, 1996, the date that appellant received his performance

rating. Appellant initiated contact with an EEO Counselor on November

7, 1997. Appellant cited October 16, 1997, as the most recent date

of discrimination. On that date, appellant received a letter from the

Brigadier General that acknowledged that another employee in the same

command as appellant received a quality step increase after the issuance

of the Commander's Guidance on November 21, 1996.

Appellant stated that his request for a quality step increase was denied

by his immediate supervisor on March 13, 1997. According to appellant,

his immediate supervisor interpreted the Commander's Guidance to mean that

requests for quality step increases could not be submitted. The record

reveals that in a letter dated August 28, 1997, from appellant to the

Commanding General, appellant identified two employees in his command

who received quality step increases since the changes to the Incentive

Awards Program went into effect on November 21, 1996. It is clear based

on the letter dated August 28, 1997, that appellant had a reasonable

suspicion of discrimination at that point. Therefore, the letter from

the Brigadier General that appellant received on October 16, 1997, only

confirmed some of the information that appellant already had obtained.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the limitation period

is triggered under the EEOC Regulations. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(2);

Ball v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05880247 (July 6,

1988). Thus, the limitations period is not triggered until a complainant

should reasonably suspect discrimination, but before all the facts that

would support a charge of discrimination have become apparent. We find

that appellant developed a reasonable suspicion of discrimination no

later than August 28, 1997, and that therefore, his contact of an EEO

Counselor more than 45 days later on November 7, 1997, was untimely.

Accordingly, the final agency decision dismissing appellant's complaint

on the grounds of untimely EEO contact is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

October 12, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations