Robert L. Boyd, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 10, 2004
01A40994 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 10, 2004)

01A40994

03-10-2004

Robert L. Boyd, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Robert L. Boyd v. United States Postal Service

01A40994

March 10, 2004

.

Robert L. Boyd,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A40994

Agency No. 1G-754-0096-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated October 31, 2003, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race, age, and reprisal

for prior EEO activity when:

On July 23, 2003, as a union steward, he was denied building access by

his manager and told that he would need an escort if he left the workroom

floor for meetings.

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim. The agency found that complainant was

not aggrieved or otherwise injured by the alleged discriminatory events.

In the present case, there is no evidence that complainant suffered a

loss in wages, received discipline or otherwise suffered any adverse

employment action as a result of the alleged discriminatory event.

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint

process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See

Wills v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30,

1998). The proper forum for complainant to raise a claim regarding his

authorization to conduct union business on agency property is with the

union. It is inappropriate to now attempt to use the EEO process to

collaterally attack actions that are properly brought pursuant to the

agency's collective bargaining agreement. We find the agency properly

dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim.

Accordingly, the agency's dismissal of the complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 10, 2004

__________________

Date