01992923
02-03-2000
Robert Jennings, Complainant, v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.
Robert Jennings, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01992923
) Agency No. 9845610001
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
____________________________________)
DECISION
INTRODUCTION
On February 25, 1999, the complainant filed an appeal with this Commission
from a final agency decision (FAD) pertaining to his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination.<1>
ISSUE PRESENTED
The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed complainant's
complaint for failure to state a claim.
BACKGROUND
Complainant filed a formal complaint on June 29, 1998 alleging that he
was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of
race (African-American) when his supervisor<2> (1) informally counseled
him for two occurrences of tardiness; (2) changed his work schedule
without appropriate justification; (3) disrespected the authority of an
African-American officer in the agency by reprimanding complainant for
matters already resolved between he and the officer; (4) made offensive
comments about complainant which defamed his character; (5) treated
him different from his coworkers in terms of discipline; (6) solicited
negative information about complainant; (7) monitored his activities;
(8) gave him a poor performance evaluation; (9) released his confidential
disciplinary information; and (10) issued him a letter of caution<3>.
Complainant further stated that the agency supported discrimination
because it continuously rewarded his supervisor professionally.
The agency issued a final decision on January 19, 1999 dismissing
complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim. This appeal
followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
Volume 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter
cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)) provides, in relevant part,
that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any employee or applicant for
employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against
by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin,
age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a).
Where a complainant does not suffer a present harm or loss regarding a
term, condition, or privilege of employment, he or she may still allege
harassment where the complaint claims, taken together and treated as
true, are sufficient to state a hostile or abusive environment claim.
See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March
13, 1997). A hostile or abusive work environment claim requires that a
complainant allege facts which, if proven true, may indicate that the
complainant was subjected to harassment that was severe or pervasive
enough to alter the conditions of his or her employment. Cobb, at 3.
In making such a determination, the Commission has considered �whether
a reasonable person in the complainant's circumstances would have found
the alleged behavior to be hostile or abusive.� Id.
Claims (2), (5), (7), (8), (9) and (10) on their face state a claim
as they affected complainant's terms, conditions, and privileges of
employment. Further, to the extent complainant raised a harassment
claim, he alleged that management consistently treated him different from
similarly situated coworkers outside of his protected class in terms
of discipline, working conditions, work environment, and appraisals.
Given the information in the record in this case, we find complainant
also set forth a claim of harassment. Accordingly, the agency's decision
to dismiss complainant's complaint is reversed.
CONCLUSION
It is the decision of the Commission to REVERSE the agency's dismissal
of complainant's complaint and REMAND it back to the agency for further
processing in accordance with this decision and applicable regulations.
ORDER (E1199)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to
the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency
shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall
notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty
(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the
matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue
a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's
request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and an
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the
complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,
the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.
29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a
civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior
to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a
civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph
below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407
and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the
underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �
2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the
administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for
enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1199)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS
OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be
submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the
absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed
timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration
of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).
The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the
other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION
(R1199)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
February 3, 2000
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that
the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
_______________ __________________________
Date
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.
2Complainant alleged his second line supervisor was the discriminating
official in most of the incidents listed herein.
3The letter of caution was not filed in his Official Personnel Folder
(OPF) but was retained in departmental files for no more than one year.
Although complainant alleged at least ten incidents of discrimination
in his complaint, the agency only addressed incidents (1), (2), and (10)
in its FAD.