Ricky B. Leggitte, Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 9, 2009
0120092267 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 9, 2009)

0120092267

09-09-2009

Ricky B. Leggitte, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Ricky B. Leggitte,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092267

Agency No. 2001-0619-2009100147

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 21, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely

EEO Counselor contact.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of race (African-American) and sex (male)

when, between 1998 and 2005, he did not receive an additional 25 percent

of his salary for performing Administrative Uncontrolled Overtime (on

call 24 hours every day).

Briefly, the record indicates complainant resigned from the agency on

August 7, 2005. In his appeal, complainant states that he was told about

the alleged discrepancies in his pay in 2003 and reported it. Complainant

states that the agency did not pursue the matter. Complainant also pursued

the matter with the Office of Personnel Management, which dismissed the

matter for lack of jurisdiction on July 22, 2008. Complainant then filed

an appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB). The MSPB also

dismissed the matter for lack of jurisdiction.

The record discloses that the last alleged discriminatory event occurred

on August 7, 2005 (when complainant resigned), but complainant did

not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until October 9, 2008,

which is beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal,

complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting

an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. We

find that complainant's contention that he knew about the discrepancy in

2003 and pursued other avenues is insufficient to justify an extension

of the applicable time limit for almost five years. See Baldwin County

Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 (1984) (per curiam) ("One

who fails to act diligently cannot invoke equitable principles to excuse

lack of diligence"); Rys v. United States Postal Service, 886 F.2d 443,

446 (1st Cir. 1989) ("to find succor in equity a Title VII plaintiff

must have diligently pursued her claim"). Further, the Commission

notes that because complainant has not worked with the agency since

2005 and no longer received a pay check from the agency at the time he

first sought EEO counseling, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009,

Public Law 111-2, 123 Stat. 5, which became law on January 29, 2009,

does not apply.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 9, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120092267

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120092267