Rick C. Reed , Complainant,v.Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 17, 2000
01995821 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 17, 2000)

01995821

02-17-2000

Rick C. Reed , Complainant, v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Rick C. Reed , )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01995821

) Agency No. 99-1335

Togo D. West, Jr., )

Secretary, )

Department of Veterans Affairs, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On July 12, 1999, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission

from a final agency decision (FAD) pertaining to his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The Commission

accepts the appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

Based on a review of the entire record, the Commission vacates the June

18, 1999 FAD due to the lack of clarity in the decision and the inadequacy

of the record. For example, we are unable to ascertain the specific

grounds for dismissal, as well as alternative grounds. Initially, the

FAD makes reference to the forty-five day time limitation for contacting

an EEO Counselor and concludes that complainant failed to discuss the

claims with a Counselor within the time limit. The agency, however,

never indicates when complainant initially contacted the EEO office.

Moreover, the Counselor's Report is not included in the record.

Furthermore, The FAD indicates that, on September 23, 1998, complainant

notified the EEO Counselor that he was withdrawing his complaint.

It is unclear whether this information is included by the agency to

support the conclusion that complainant withdrew the instant complaint

or rather that the instant complaint states the same claim as raised

by complainant in another complaint. Further, the agency describes

facts indicating that perhaps complainant never contacted a counselor.

Therefore, the Commission is unable to determine the grounds for the

agency's dismissal.

With respect to the record, we find that the agency has failed to meet

its burden of providing sufficient evidence in support of the FAD.

See Henry v. U.S. Postal Service EEOC Request No. 05940897 (May 10,

1995), (citing Gens v. Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency,

EEOC Request No. 05910837 (January 31, 1992).

Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing the complaint is VACATED

and we REMAND the complaint to the agency for further processing in

accordance with this decision and the applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following actions:

The agency shall issue a new final decision, with appeal rights to

the Commission. The final decision must explicitly define all the

allegations in the complaint. In dismissing any claims, the agency

must specify the exact legal grounds for dismissal and the specific

evidence upon which the agency has relied to support its dismissal.

Any evidence relied upon in the decision will be included in the record.

Further, the agency shall include in the record any EEO Counselor's

Reports pertaining to the instant case.

The agency shall complete all of the above actions within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. A copy of

the notice of processing or final agency decision must be sent to the

Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS

OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R1199)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to

file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 17, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

_______________ __________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant