Richfield Oil Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 7, 194983 N.L.R.B. 1242 (N.L.R.B. 1949) Copy Citation ,In the Matter of RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION, EMPLOYER and MAIN- TENANCE EMPLOYEES AT 2545 E. 24TH ST., Los ANGELES, CALIFORNIA OF RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION, PETITIONERS and OIL WORKERS IN- TERNATIONAL UNION, CIO,' UNION Case No. 21-RD-64.-Decided June 7, 1949 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition for decertification duly filed, hearing in this case Was held before Eugene Mathew Purver, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Members Houston, Reynolds, and Murdock]. , Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The Petitioners assert that the Union is no longer the bargain- ing representative of the employees of the Employer as defined in Sec- tion 9 (a) of the Act. 3. Following a consent election the Regional Director for the Twenty-first Region, on August 6, 1946, certified that the Union had been designated as the bargaining representative for a unit of produc- tion and maintenance employees of the Employer. Thereafter, the Union and the Employer executed a collective bargaining agreement, which expired on September 3, 1948. The Union failed to appear at the hearings in this case which were held on March 17, 1949, and April 5, 1949. However, the Board is in receipt of a letter, dated May 17, 1949, from the Union in which it dis- claims any interest in the employees of the Employer 2 The Union has, therefore, withdrawn its claim to represent a majority of such employees.3 1 The Union's name appears as amended at the hearing. 2 Local 128 , 011 Workers International Union , which appears to be an interested party, filed with the Board a letter, dated April 8, 1949 , similarly disclaiming any interest in the employees of the Employer. 8 Matter of Crane Company, 81 N. L . R. B. 460 ; Matter of Terrytoens, Inc., 77 N . L. R. B. 471 ; Matter of St. Paul Brass Foundry Co., 78 N . L. R. B. 623. 83 N. L. B. B., No. 171. 1242 RICHFIELD OIL CORPORATION 1243 We find that no question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, and we shall, therefore, dismiss the petition. ORDER Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and the entire record in this case, it is hereby ordered that the petition for decertification of representatives in the above-entitled matter be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation