01981887
01-29-1999
Richard Shavensky, Appellant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.
Richard Shavensky v. Department of Transportation
01981887
January 29, 1999
Richard Shavensky, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01981887
) Agency No. 1981020
Rodney E. Slater, )
Secretary, )
Department of Transportation, )
Agency. )
_________________________________)
DECISION
Appellant filed the instant appeal from the agency's December 10, 1997
decision dismissing a portion of appellant's complaint for electing
to file a grievance on the same matter and the remaining portion of the
complaint for failing to timely contact an EEO Counselor. In the agency's
decision the agency did not define the four allegations which it found
were not timely raised with an EEO Counselor. The agency defined the two
allegations which the agency found were raised in a grievance as follows:
Two of the three training review board members made a recommendation to
Person A to terminate appellant's training.
Appellant was offered a position in Morristown in lieu of separation.
In a letter dated November 24, 1997 appellant attempted to clarify
the instant complaint dated September 29, 1997. Appellant stated
that he had numbered the items in his complaint 1 through 6, but
"[a]fter reading the grievance, the only item in question is number
one of the EEO complaint." After reviewing appellant's complaint
and the November 24, 1997 letter from appellant, the Commission finds
that it is not clear which allegations appellant is pursuing and which
allegations are background information or merely evidence in support of
other allegations. The agency's failure to define all the allegations
it was dismissing also renders doubt as to the proper definition of
the complaint. The Commission shall remand the matter so that the
agency can contact appellant to clarify the complaint. Thereafter,
the agency shall redetermine whether dismissal of any of the allegations
for electing to raise the matter in a negotiated grievance procedure and
for failure to timely contact an EEO Counselor is appropriate pursuant
to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(d) and �1614.107(b).
The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is VACATED and we REMAND
the complaint to the agency for further processing in accordance with
this decision and applicable regulations.
ORDER
The agency shall contact appellant to clarify the complaint. Thereafter,
the agency shall redetermine whether dismissal of any of the allegations
in the complaint for electing to raise the matter in a negotiated
grievance procedure and for failure to timely contact an EEO Counselor
is appropriate pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(d) and �1614.107(b).
Within 90 days of the date this decision becomes final the agency
shall either issue a letter to appellant accepting the complaint for
investigation or issue a new decision dismissing the complaint. A copy
of the letter accepting the complaint or new decision dismissing the
complaint must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced herein.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The
report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting
documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to
the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's
order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of
the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right
to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's
order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.
See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,
the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying
complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to
File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil
action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is
subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16� (Supp. V 1993).
If the appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of
the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you
have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some
jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner
suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your
civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN
THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision
or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the
jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,
you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR
DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME
AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY
HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME
AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of
your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
January 29, 1999
DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director
Office of Federal Operations