Reynolds Spring Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 28, 194878 N.L.R.B. 632 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of REYNOLDS SPRING COMPANY , EMPLOYER and INTER- NATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AIRCRAFT AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA, UAW-CIO, PETITIONER Case No. 7-RC-62.-Decided July 28, 1948 DECISION - AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before a hearing officer of the National Labor Relations Board. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has 'delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-man panel consisting of the undersigned Board Members.* Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the: National Labor Relations Act. 2. The labor organization named below claims to represent em- ployees of the Employer. 3. A question of representation exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The following employees of the Employer constitute a unit appro- priate for.,purposes -of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9'(b) of, the Act.. . All production and maintenance employees of the Employer at its Coldwater, Michigan, plant, excluding office and clerical employees, time-study: men, guards, and supervisors.; 5. The Employer contends-that an election at this tiine is premature in view of an expanding unit. As of the hearing date there were 131 employees in the unit. A full complement of 250 employees in the unit is anticipated as a result of a vigorous sales drive currently *Chairman Herzog and Members Reynolds and Murdock. 78 N. L. R. B.. No. 76. 632 REYNOLDS SPRING COMPANY 633 being conducted to increase the demand for the Employer's products. We reject the Employer's contention and shall direct an immediate election for the reason, inter alia, that a substantial and representative working force is presently employed in the production of rinished products.' DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with the Employer, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than 30 days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and super- vision of the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board, Rules and Regulations-Series 5, among the em- ployees in the unit found appropriate in paragraph numbered 4, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Election, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or rein= stated prior to the date of the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented, for purposes of collective bar- gaining, by International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW-CIO. 1 Matter of Western Electric Company, Incorporated , 76 N. L. R. B. 400 ; Matter of International Harvester Company , 71 N. L. R. B 680. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation