) Request No. 05970944

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 2, 2000
04980032 (E.E.O.C. May. 2, 2000)

04980032

05-02-2000

) Request No. 05970944


Heidi S. Hamby v. Department of the Army

04980032

May 2, 2000

Heidi S. Hamby, )

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) Petition No. 04980032

) Request No. 05970944

Louis Caldera, ) Appeal No. 01955808

Secretary, ) Agency No. T-0464-FL-A-01-94-GO

Department of the Army )

(Army National Guard Bureau),)

Agency. )

)

DECISION ON PETITIONS FOR ENFORCEMENT AND CLARIFICATION

On July 14, 1998, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC

or Commission) docketed a Petition for Enforcement from Heidi S. Hamby

(petitioner) requesting enforcement of the Commission's Order in Heidi

S. Hamby v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05970944 (May

21, 1998). The Department of the Army (agency) subsequently filed a

cross-petition for clarification of the same order. The Petitions were

properly filed in accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a).<1> For the

reasons set forth herein, both Petitions are GRANTED.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue presented in this petition is whether the agency has fully

complied with the Order of the Commission set forth in EEOC Appeal

No. 05970944.

BACKGROUND

The salient facts of this case are as follows: On an appeal filed

by petitioner, the Commission found that the agency had discriminated

against petitioner in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., and ordered the agency,

inter alia, to reinstate petitioner to her former position with the

Florida Army National Guard. Heidi S. Hamby v. Department of the Army,

EEOC Appeal No. 01955808 (June 30, 1997). The agency's request for

reconsideration of this decision was denied. Heidi S. Hamby v. Department

of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05970944 (May 21, 1998). Subsequently,

petitioner filed a petition for enforcement of the Commission's Order,

arguing that the agency had not reinstated her to her former position,

and had not tendered the amount of back pay which was due and owing.

The agency filed a petition for clarification stating that, while it

would comply with the remaining provisions of the Commission's Order

(retroactive back pay and benefits, posting order, and attorney fees), it

could not comply with the portion of the Order directing it to reinstate

petitioner to her former position with the agency. The agency explained

that effective July 15, 1998, petitioner's "federal recognition as a

military officer" had been withdrawn, and that without such recognition,

petitioner was statutorily ineligible to return to her former position

with the Army National Guard.<2>

ANALYSIS and FINDINGS

The record in the instant case reflects that petitioner's federal

recognition as a military officer was, in fact, withdrawn effective

July 15, 1998, and that as of that date, petitioner no longer meets

the statutory qualifications for her former position with the agency.

The Commission notes that the decision to withdraw petitioner's

federal recognition as a military officer is outside of the Commission's

jurisdiction, and is not subject to review in this forum. The Commission

therefore clarifies its Order in Request No. 05970944 to reflect that

the agency is obliged to tender back pay and benefits through July 15,

1998, the date on which petitioner became ineligible for reinstatement,

but is not obliged to reinstate petitioner to a position for which she

is no longer statutorily qualified.

However, the record in this case contains no report of compliance or other

form of documentary evidence showing that the agency has complied with

the remaining portion of the Commission's Order in Request No. 05970944.

Accordingly, the Commission finds that the agency is not in compliance

with that Order. The agency is admonished that it must comply with

the Order of the Commission set forth below, or face sanctions for its

failure to do so.

CONCLUSION

Based upon a careful review of the record, and for the foregoing reasons,

it is the decision of the Commission to GRANT both the petition for

enforcement and the petition for clarification.

ORDER (D1199)

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial actions:

(1) The agency shall tender to petitioner back pay and benefits for

the period July 27, 1994, through July 15, 1998, in accordance with the

directions set forth below.

(2) The agency shall post a notice of the finding of discrimination in

accordance with the below-entitled paragraph, "Posting Order."

(3) The agency shall pay petitioner's reasonable attorney fees and costs

in accordance with the below-entitled paragraph, "Attorney's Fees."

The agency shall determine the appropriate amount of back pay (with

interest, if applicable) and other benefits due petitioner, pursuant to

29 C.F.R. � 1614.501, no later than sixty (60) calendar days after the

date this decision becomes final. The petitioner shall cooperate in the

agency's efforts to compute the amount of back pay and benefits due,

and shall provide all relevant information requested by the agency.

If there is a dispute regarding the exact amount of back pay and/or

benefits, the agency shall issue a check to the petitioner for the

undisputed amount within sixty (60) calendar days of the date the

agency determines the amount it believes to be due. The petitioner may

petition for enforcement or clarification of the amount in dispute.

The petition for clarification or enforcement must be filed with the

Compliance Officer, at the address referenced in the statement entitled

"Implementation of the Commission's Decision."

The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision." The report shall include supporting documentation of the

agency's calculation of back pay and other benefits due petitioner,

including evidence that the corrective action has been implemented.

POSTING ORDER (G1092)

The agency is ORDERED to post at its Army National Guard Bureau,

St. Augustine, Florida, facility copies of the attached notice.

Copies of the notice, after being signed by the agency's duly authorized

representative, shall be posted by the agency within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final, and shall remain posted

for sixty (60) consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all

places where notices to employees are customarily posted. The agency

shall take reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered,

defaced, or covered by any other material. The original signed notice

is to be submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited in

the paragraph entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision,"

within ten (10) calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

ATTORNEY'S FEES (H1199)

If petitioner has been represented by an attorney (as defined by 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(1)(iii)), he/she is entitled to

an award of reasonable attorney's fees incurred in the processing of the

complaint. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e). The award of attorney's fees shall

be paid by the agency. The attorney shall submit a verified statement of

fees to the agency -- not to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

Office of Federal Operations -- within thirty (30) calendar days of this

decision becoming final. The agency shall then process the claim for

attorney's fees in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

petitioner. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the petitioner may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The petitioner also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the petitioner has the right to file a civil

action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the petitioner files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT

PETITIONER's RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R1199)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN

THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

May 2, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to petitioner, petitioner's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

______________________________________ __________________

Equal Opportunity Specialist Date

This Notice is posted pursuant to an Order by the United States Equal

Employment Opportunity Commission dated _____________ which found that

a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq., has occurred at this facility.

Federal law requires that there be no discrimination against any

employee or applicant for employment because of that person's RACE,

COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, NATIONAL ORIGIN, AGE, or PHYSICAL or MENTAL

DISABILITY with respect to hiring, firing, promotion, compensation,

or other terms, conditions, or privileges of employment.

The Army National Guard Bureau, St. Augutsine, Florida, supports and

will comply with such Federal law and will not take action against

individuals because they have exercised their rights under law.

The Army National Guard Bureau, St. Augutsine, Florida, has been

found to have discriminated against the individual affected by the

Commission's finding. The Army National Guard Bureau, St. Augutsine,

Florida, shall tender back pay and benefits to the affected individual,

and shall pay the affected individual's reasonable attorney fees

and costs. The Army National Guard Bureau, St. Augutsine, Florida,

will ensure that officials responsible for personnel decisions and

terms and conditions of employment will abide by the requirements of

all Federal equal employment opportunity laws and will not retaliate

against employees who file EEO complaints.

The Army National Guard Bureau, St. Augutsine, Florida, will not in any

manner restrain, interfere, coerce, or retaliate against any individual

who exercises his or her right to oppose practices made unlawful by,

or who participates in proceedings pursuant to, Federal equal employment

opportunity law.

_________________________

Date Posted: ____________________

Posting Expires: _________________

29 C.F.R. Part 1614

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2It is noted that petitioner's federal recognition initially was

withdrawn prior to the issuance of the Commission's decision in Request

No. 05970944; the withdrawal was subsequently rescinded and reissued on

account of a procedural defect.