[Redacted], Wilfred B., 1 Complainant,v.John E. Whitley, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.Download PDFEqual Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 27, 2021Appeal No. 2020002167 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 27, 2021) Copy Citation U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Wilfred B.,1 Complainant, v. John E. Whitley, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency. Appeal No. 2020002167 Hearing No. 420-2018-00115X Agency No. ARIMCOMHQ17SEP04181 DECISION Complainant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) concerning his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. For the following reasons, the Commission AFFIRMS the Agency’s final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint. BACKGROUND At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a General Engineer, GS-0801-13, at the Agency’s Logistics Support Activity in Redstone Arsenal, Alabama. On December 13, 2017, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity (Agency Nos. ARRESTON17MAY01829, ARREDSTON15AUG04058 and ARREDSTON13JUL02070) regarding the processing of those complaints. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2020002167 2 On December 21, 2017, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(8) as a “spin-off” complaint, for raising a complaint about the processing of an existing complaint. On December 3, 2019, an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) from the Birmingham District Office issued a Decision and Order of Dismissal dismissing Complainant’s hearing request on the subject complaint. The AJ noted that Complainant’s hearing request was premature as it was filed before he filed his formal complaint but that he ultimately timely filed a complaint, which was dismissed by the Agency via a final decision. The AJ stated the Birmingham District Office lacked jurisdiction over the complaint because the hearing request was premature and a final decision properly issued from the Agency (and no appeal was filed). Further, the AJ stated that even if the complaint were properly before the Birmingham District Office, it appropriately would be dismissed as a “spin-off” complaint. ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(8) provides that an Agency shall dismiss claims alleging dissatisfaction with the processing of a prior complaint. Dissatisfaction with the EEO process must be raised during the processing of the underlying complaint, and not as a new independent complaint. Upon review, we find Complainant’s complaint alleges dissatisfaction with the EEO processing of his prior complaints. Thus, we AFFIRM the Agency’s final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint. STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL RECONSIDERATION (M0920) The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider this appellate decision if Complainant or the Agency submits a written request that contains arguments or evidence that tend to establish that: 1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or 2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. Requests for reconsideration must be filed with EEOC’s Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. If the party requesting reconsideration elects to file a statement or brief in support of the request, that statement or brief must be filed together with the request for reconsideration. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days from receipt of another party’s request for reconsideration within which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). 2020002167 3 Complainant should submit his or her request for reconsideration, and any statement or brief in support of his or her request, via the EEOC Public Portal, which can be found at https://publicportal.eeoc.gov/Portal/Login.aspx. Alternatively, Complainant can submit his or her request and arguments to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, via regular mail addressed to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail addressed to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, a complainant’s request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if OFO receives it by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. An agency’s request for reconsideration must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). Either party’s request and/or statement or brief in opposition must also include proof of service on the other party, unless Complainant files his or her request via the EEOC Public Portal, in which case no proof of service is required. Failure to file within the 30-day time period will result in dismissal of the party’s request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted together with the request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c). COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610) You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. 2020002167 4 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ___________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations April 27, 2021 Date Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation