[Redacted], Sheila O., 1 Complainant,v.Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southern Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Sep 2, 2021

Appeal No. 2020003917 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 2, 2021)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Sheila O.,1 Complainant, v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southern Area), Agency. Request No. 2021003424 Appeal No. 2020003917 Agency No. 4G-780-0047-17 Hearing No. 451-2017-00111X DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in Sheila O. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 2020003917 (March 23, 2021). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). During the period at issue, Complainant was employed by the Agency as a Labor Custodial, P- 04, at the Cedar Park Post Office in Cedar Park, Texas. On February 2, 2017, Complainant filed a formal complaint, claiming discrimination based on race (Mexican), sex (female), and in reprisal for prior protected activity, when her supervisor 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2 20210003424 told her that she was taking food home to feed her family, her supervisor questioned why Complainant was in the break room, management has not taken any action when her supervisor stated that she hates Complainant, yells and talks down to her, rolls her eyes, tells her she is not working, and laughs at her, and her supervisor told her that she is not “doing a damned thing, and that “you’ve been here too long doing nothing.” Following an investigation, Complainant requested a hearing. The Administrative Judge (AJ) notified the parties sua sponte of the intent to issue a decision without a hearing. Thereafter, the AJ issued a summary judgment finding that Complainant did not establish harassment related to any raised basis. The Agency issued a final order implementing the AJ’s decision. Complainant appealed. In EEOC Appeal No. 2020003917, the appellate decision affirmed the Agency’s final order. In the instant request for reconsideration, Complainant submits a brief statement expressing disagreement with the appellate decision and reiterating arguments previously made, or which could have been made, on appeal. However, we emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9 § VI.A (Aug. 5, 2015); see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2020003917 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. 3 20210003424 RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations September 2, 2021 Date