[Redacted], Ollie N., 1 Complainant,v.Xavier Becerra, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Oct 6, 2021

Appeal No. 2020000165 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 6, 2021)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Ollie N.,1 Complainant, v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Agency. Request No. 2021004000 Appeal No. 2020000165 Agency No. HHS-OS-0039-2017 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in Ollie N. v. Dep’t of Health and Human Service, EEOC Appeal No. 2020000165 (June 8, 2021). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). On June 2, 2017, Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging the following: 1. The Agency subjected him to the harassment on the bases of national origin (French), sex (male), religion (Christian), disability (physical), age, and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: a. Complainant was denied resources to accomplish his mission (i.e., a scanner); b. A management official yelled at Complainant; 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2021004000 2 c. Management delayed implementing Complainant’s reasonable accommodation (a computer) (January 2017); d. Management failed to approve awards for Complainant’s subordinates; e. Complainant did not receive an award (Quality Step Increase); f. Management inappropriately provided a copy of a statement Complainant made about the subject of an investigation to that individual; g. Complainant was sent an email with an attachment containing a cartoon that Complainant found inappropriate and offensive; and 3. The Agency subjected Complainant to harassment in retaliation for his prior EEO activity when the following occurred: a. Complainant was placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of a complaint filed with the Merit Systems Protection Board to remove him from Federal service (January 19, 2018); and b. Complainant was placed in a furloughed status due to a lapse of appropriations (January 22, 2018).2 Complainant requested an Agency decision. The Agency issued a decision dismissing claims 1d and 1e for failure to state a claim and finding no discrimination and no harassment as alleged regarding the remaining claims. Complainant appealed, and the Commission’s prior decision affirmed the Agency’s decision. In his request, Complainant provides no evidence to warrant granting his request. The Commission emphasizes that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110) (Aug. 5, 2015), at 9-18; see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2020000165 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. 2 There is no claim 2. For the sake of consistency, the numbering here is kept the same. 2021004000 3 COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations October 6, 2021 Date