[Redacted], Lidia B., 1 Complainant,v.Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Dec 13, 2021

Appeal No. 2020002225 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 13, 2021)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 Lidia B.,1 Complainant, v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary, Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency), Agency. Request No. 2021004150 Appeal No. 2020002225 Hearing No. 510-2019-00424X Agency No. DeCA-00008-2019 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2020002225 (June 15, 2021). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). During the relevant time, Complainant worked as a Sales Store Checker, GS-3, at the Agency’s Mayport Commissary in Atlantic Beach, Florida. Complainant filed a formal complaint claiming discrimination and harassment based on disability. 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2021004150 2 Complainant alleged that her supervisor presented her with her second letter for excessive absence then stated Complainant did not get hurt at work, Complainant was counseled on the possibility of reduction in duty hours and removal, and Complainant had previously received her first letter for excessive absence; Complainant’s supervisor requested all employees under her supervision to sign a copy of the Defense Commissary Blotter Report that pertained to requirements; Complainant was denied her request for leave and considered or marked absent without leave; and Complainant’s supervisor marked Complainant as “Met” in the areas of safety, customer care, and cash handling, and Complainant’s supervisor told Complainant that she was rated as “Met” because Complainant was disabled and could not move her arm. After an investigation, Complainant requested a hearing, but subsequently withdrew her request. Thereafter, the Agency issued a final order concluding the evidence of record, developed during the investigation, did not establish and discrimination or discriminatory harassment. Complainant appealed. In EEOC Appeal No. 2020002225, the Commission affirmed the Agency’s final order finding no discrimination or harassment. In the instant request for reconsideration, we have carefully reviewed Complainant’s arguments and determine that the matters either were raised or could have been raised below. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), Chap. 9 § VI.A (Aug. 5, 2015); see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here. After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2020002225 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610) This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. 2021004150 3 RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations December 13, 2021 Date