[Redacted], John H., 1 Complainant,v.Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Feb 3, 2021

Appeal No. 2020003637 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 3, 2021)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Federal Operations P.O. Box 77960 Washington, DC 20013 John H.,1 Complainant, v. Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency. Request No. 2021000253 Appeal No. 2020003637 Agency No. 4E-852-0039-20 DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION Complainant timely requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) reconsider its decision in John H. v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 2020003637 (Oct. 8, 2020). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision issued pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(a), where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c). Complainant worked as a City Carrier for the Agency in Casa Grande, Arizona. On January 14, 2020, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American), religion (Hebrew Israelite), color (Black), age, and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: 1. On December 11, 2019, management officials took no action after [Complainant] informed them that a co-worker pushed down [his] flyers; 1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant’s name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission’s website. 2021000253 2 2. On December 12, 2019, [Complainant was] placed on Emergency Placement after having an argument with a co-worker; 3. Since December 12, 2019, [Complainant has] been deprived of overtime opportunities; 4. On December 13, 2019, and December 16, 2019, [Complainant was] issued an injunction by [his] supervisor and a co-worker regarding the December 12, 2019 incident. 5. On December 27, 2019, during an interrogation, [Complainant was] asked questions that were not on the investigatory form and he was accused of not following instructions; 6. On January 29. 2020, [Complainant] became aware that a co-worker and supervisor conspired against [him] when they agreed with management regarding the December 12, 2019 incident. 7. On January 22, 2020, [Complainant] became aware that after mailing [his] formal complaint on January 14, 2020, it did not leave the General Mail Facility until January 22, 2020. 8. On March 2, 2020, [Complainant was] issued a Notice of Proposed Adverse Action- Removal; 9. On April 2, 2020, [Complainant] received a Letter of Decision upholding the Notice of Proposed Removal dated March 2, 2020. The Agency issued a final decision dismissing the entire complaint. The Agency dismissed claims (1) - (6) and (8) - (9) on the ground that Complainant filed a Merit Systems Protection Board appeal on the removal action and dismissed claim (7) for failure to state a claim. Complainant appealed, and, in John H. v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Appeal No. 2020003637 (Oct. 8, 2020), the Commission affirmed the Agency’s dismissal of claims (1) - (6) and (8) - (9). However, the Commission determined the Agency improperly dismissed claim (7), finding that Complainant stated an actionable claim of reprisal. The Commission reversed the Agency’s dismissal of claim (7) with respect to reprisal and remanded the matter to the Agency for further processing. In his request for reconsideration, Complainant raises arguments previously raised on appeal and expresses his disagreement with the Commission’s previous decision. The Commission emphasizes that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal. Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (Aug. 5, 2015); see, e.g., Lopez v. Dep't of Agric., EEOC Request No. 0520070736 (Aug. 20, 2007). Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. 2021000253 3 Complainant has not done so here. Complainant has not presented any evidence establishing that the Commission erred in finding that the Agency properly dismissed claims (1) - (6) and (8) - (9). After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to DENY the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 2020003637 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request. ORDER (E0618) The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim (claim (7) with respect to basis of reprisal) in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.108 et seq. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision was issued. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision was issued, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request. As provided in the statement entitled “Implementation of the Commission's Decision,” the Agency must send to the Compliance Officer: 1) a copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant, 2) a copy of the Agency's notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights, and 3) either a copy of the complainant's request for a hearing, a copy of complainant's request for a FAD, or a statement from the agency that it did not receive a response from complainant by the end of the election period. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0719) Under 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405(c) and § 1614.502, compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. Within seven (7) calendar days of the completion of each ordered corrective action, the Agency shall submit via the Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP) supporting documents in the digital format required by the Commission, referencing the compliance docket number under which compliance was being monitored. Once all compliance is complete, the Agency shall submit via FedSEP a final compliance report in the digital format required by the Commission. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The Agency's final report must contain supporting documentation when previously not uploaded, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant and his/her representative. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). 2021000253 4 Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409. Failure by an agency to either file a compliance report or implement any of the orders set forth in this decision, without good cause shown, may result in the referral of this matter to the Office of Special Counsel pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(f) for enforcement by that agency. COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (Q0610) This decision affirms the Agency’s final decision/action in part, but it also requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint. RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815) If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. 2021000253 5 Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits). FOR THE COMMISSION: ______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature Carlton M. Hadden, Director Office of Federal Operations February 3, 2021 Date