01A01573
05-22-2000
Raymond W. Leone v. Department of the Navy
01A01573
May 22, 2000
Raymond W. Leone, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01A01573
) Agency No. 99-65886-002
Richard J. Danzig, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Navy, )
Agency. )
____________________________________)
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
On December 13, 1999, complainant filed an appeal with this Commission
claiming that the agency breached the September 1, 1999, settlement
agreement into which the parties entered concerning complainant's
individual right of action (IRA) before the Merit System Protection Board
(MSPB).<1> Specifically, because of the claimed breach, complainant
requests reinstatement of his EEO complaint, which was withdrawn by him
pursuant to provision 9 (P9) of the settlement agreement.
Review of the record discloses that, simultaneous with the instant
appeal, complainant also filed a motion with the MSPB entitled "Request
for Order to Comply with Agreement," asking for enforcement of the
settlement agreement regarding the claimed breach, but only as it
pertains to the IRA. This motion also indicated complainant's desire
to have his EEO complaint be reinstated because of the claimed breach.
The record additionally shows that on October 6, 1999, complainant
filed a "Petition for Review" with the MSPB claiming that P9 was an
unconstitutional infringement of his First Amendment right to free speech,
and should be declared unenforceable as such.<2>
The Commission finds that this matter is not properly before us on appeal.
Specifically, the alleged settlement breach deals with the implementation
of an MSPB settlement agreement. Therefore, the MSPB would have proper
jurisdiction of this matter. See Carlo v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05940759
(May 4, 1995). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS
THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
May 22, 2000
____________________________
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.
2The record contains no information regarding the MSPB's disposition of
this petition.