Raymond Machak, Complainant,v.Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 20, 2009
0120091841 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2009)

0120091841

08-20-2009

Raymond Machak, Complainant, v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department of Justice, Agency.


Raymond Machak,

Complainant,

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,

Attorney General,

Department of Justice,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091841

Agency No. P20080613

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated March 5, 2009, holding in abeyance his formal complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior protected EEO activity

when, on August 5, 2008, the agency rescinded its offer of reinstatement

with its United States Penitentiary-Canaan in Waymart, Pennsylvania.

On March 5, 2008, the agency issued a decision. Therein, the agency

stated that complainant's formal complaint was being held in abeyance

pending the possible certification of a class complaint. Specifically,

the agency determined that the claim raised in complainant's formal

complaint was related to the claim raised in Turner v. Department of

Justice, Agency Nos. P-2004-0296 and P-2005-0128. The agency stated that

that Dennis Turner, the class agent in Turner v. Department of Justice,

Agency Nos. P-2004-0296 and P-2005-0128, filed a class complaint, claiming

that he and others within the agency were discriminated against on the

basis of reprisal for prior EEO activity when the agency engaged in a

pattern or practice of retaliating by denying promotion opportunities to

employees who engaged in prior protected activity. However, the record

contains no copy of this class complaint.

As an initial matter, we note that the Commission has previously

held that a complainant may appeal an agency decision to hold an

individual complaint in abeyance during the processing of a related

class complaint. See Roos v. United States Postal Service, EEOC

Request No. 05920101 (February 13, 1992). In addition, Equal Employment

Opportunity Management Directive-110 (MD-110), Chapter 8, � III (C)

(November 9, 1999) provides, in relevant part, that "an individual

complaint that is filed before or after the class complaint is filed

and that comes within the definition of the class claim(s), will not

be dismissed but will be subsumed within the class complaint. If the

class complaint is dismissed at the certification level, the individual

complaint may still proceed ..."

In this case, however, the Commission notes that the agency determined

that complainant's formal complaint should be held in abeyance because

it is "identical" to the claim raised in the Turner class complaint. As

the record contains no copy of the class complaint, it is impossible to

determine whether or not the instant individual complaint is identical

to the class complaint. Moreover, the class complaint, as identified

by the agency in it final decision, is a claim of retaliation regarding

decisions relating to promotional opportunities. Based on the agency's

characterization of the class claim, reinstatement as an issue appears

not to have been an issue raised in the class complaint.

The Commission notes that the agency has placed a number of other cases,

in addition to the instant one, in abeyance as involving the same issues

as those raised in Turner v. Department of Justice. The Commission

cautions the agency that it must carefully determine whether or not

complaints fall within the Order issued by the EEOC Administrative

Judge in the Turner class action. The agency may risk being sanctioned

if it is determined that its decisions to hold cases in abeyance are

being made to avoid compliance with the agency's obligation to process

formal complaints in a timely manner consistent with EEOC's regulations

and MD-110. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.404(c); see also MD-110, Chapter 9.

CONCLUSION

Upon review of the record, the agency's decision to hold the complaint

in abeyance is REVERSED, and the complaint is REMANDED to the agency

for further processing in accordance with the following ORDER.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded complaint in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 20, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120091841

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

5

0120091841