Raymond Fisher, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 6, 2000
01995259 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 6, 2000)

01995259

07-06-2000

Raymond Fisher, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Raymond Fisher v. United States Postal Service

01995259

July 6, 2000

Raymond Fisher, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01995259

) Agency No. 4C-150-0048-99

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On June 15, 1999, complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission

from the May 17, 1999 final agency decision (FAD), dismissing his EEO

complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of the Age

Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �

621 et seq.<1> The Commission accepts the appeal in accordance with 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).

Complainant contacted the EEO office on January 26, 1999, regarding a

claim of discrimination based on age. Informal efforts to resolve his

concerns were unsuccessful. On April 20, 1999, complainant filed a

formal complaint.

The agency framed the complainant's claim as follows:

In September 1998, other probationary employees retained the same

beginning and ending times throughout their probationary period, cased

mail every day, usually carried a full route and when they carried

cuts off of routes, they were allowed to case mail for the following

day to complete eight hours.

On November 16, 1998 complainant was terminated for poor work

performance during his probationary period.

The agency dismissed the claim for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

Specifically, the agency indicated that evidence of record demonstrates

that complainant did not contact an EEO Counselor until approximately one

hundred-eighteen days after the matter raised in claim 1 and seventy-one

days after the matter raised in claim 2..

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to

be codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(2)), for untimely EEO contact. The record discloses that

the alleged discriminatory events occurred in September 1998 and on

November 16, 1998, but that complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until January 26, 1999, beyond the forty-five (45) day

limitation period. On appeal, no persuasive argument or evidence have

been presented to warrant an extension of the time limit. Accordingly,

the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is

AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

July 6, 2000

________________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to

all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the

revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable,

in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be

found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.