Rayford H.,1 Complainant,v.Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 11, 2016
0120160348 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 11, 2016)

0120160348

03-11-2016

Rayford H.,1 Complainant, v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Rayford H.,1

Complainant,

v.

Megan J. Brennan,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Western Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120160348

Agency No. 4E840004915

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated September 15, 2015, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a City Carrier at the Agency's Cottonwood Station in Cottonwood, Utah.

On August 20, 2015, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of disability, age (57), and reprisal when: (1) on November 14, 2014, his health insurance was cancelled, although later reinstated; (2) on February 13, 2015, management refused to abide by a grievance settlement agreeing to pay him 45 days of continuation of pay (COP) benefits; and (3) on March 30, 2015, he became aware that his supervisor had provided false information in 2013 on the accident report, PS Form 3971, and on compensation claims forms pertaining to an on-the-job injury.

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a), for failure to state a claim and untimely EEO counselor contact. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

It appears all of these claims relate to Complainant's on-the-job injury.

As an initial matter, to the extent Complainant is challenging actions directly related to the adjudication of his worker's compensation claim, he must raise such matters with the Department of Labor, not within the EEO complaint process. See, e.g., Fisher v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05931059 (July 15, 1994) (challenge to agency's appeal within the workers' compensation process fails to state a claim as an EEO complaint). Additionally, to the extent that Complainant is alleging that the Agency failed to comply with a grievance settlement, he must raise such challenges under the collective bargaining agreement, not with the union.

As to the timeliness of the claims, EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action. In the instant case, all of the incidents alleged to be discriminatory occurred more than 45 days before April 15, 2015, the date Complainant first contacted an EEO counselor. The last incident of alleged discrimination occurred on February 13, 2015.2

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0815)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 11, 2016

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

2 While Complainant asserts he was not aware that his supervisor had provided false information during the processing of his worker's compensation claim until March 30, 2015, this claim is not properly in the EEO complaint process as it directly involved the adjudication of his worker's compensation claim by the Department of Labor.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120160348

2

0120160348