Rafael Campos, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 15, 2009
0120093397 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 15, 2009)

0120093397

12-15-2009

Rafael Campos, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Rafael Campos,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093397

Agency No. 4G752024809

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated July 8, 2009, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was improperly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim.

In a complaint dated June 19, 2009, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to hostile workplace discrimination on the bases of

disability (Back) and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under

the Rehabilitation Act when: on or around April 21, 2009, he was placed

off the clock and was informed that he would be terminated. Complainant

requested compensatory damages as a part of his remedy in this matter.

In its final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's claim,

finding that on May 20, 2009, complainant had resolved this matter at

Step B of the agency's grievance process. In his appeal statement,

complainant expands the scope of his claim beyond what was stated in his

formal complaint but argues that "the relief gained thus far through

the Union has not irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged

violations. There are issues of harm, discrimination, and damages as

yet unaddressed."

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(5) provides for

the dismissal of a complaint when the issues raised therein are moot.

To determine whether the issues raised in complainant's complaint are

moot, the factfinder must ascertain whether (1) it can be said with

assurance that there is no reasonable expectation that the alleged

violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events have completely

and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged discrimination.

See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979); Kuo

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July 10, 1998).

When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and no need for

a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

However, the Commission has held that an agency must address the issue

of compensatory damages when a complainant shows objective evidence

that he has incurred compensatory damages, and that the damages are

related to the alleged discrimination. Jackson v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01923399 (November 12, 1992), request

for reconsideration denied, EEOC Request No. 05930306 (February 1,

1993). Should complainant prevail on this complaint, the possibility

of an award of compensatory damages exists. See Glover v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01930696 (December 9, 1993).

Because complainant requested compensatory damages, the agency should

have requested that complainant provide some objective proof of the

alleged damages incurred, as well as objective evidence linking those

damages to the adverse actions at issue. See Allen v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05970672 (June 12, 1998); Benton

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01932422 (December 3, 1993).

As the agency failed to address the issue of compensatory damages, we find

that dismissal on the grounds that it was rendered moot was improper.

See Rouston v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, EEOC

Request No. 05970388 (March 18, 1999).

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is reversed. The complaint is hereby remanded to the agency

for further processing in accordance with this decision and the Order

below.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,

DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,

and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.

If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil

Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party. Failure to file within the time

period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration

as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely

filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted

with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider

requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very

limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 15, 2009

__________________

Date

2

0120093397

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

4

0120093397