Radio Corp. of AmericaDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJan 28, 1954107 N.L.R.B. 993 (N.L.R.B. 1954) Copy Citation RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, RCA VICTOR DIVISION 993 RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, RCA VICTOR DIVISION and OFFICE -EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL, Petitioner . Case No. 4-RC-2069. January 28, 1954 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed under Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, a hearing was held before William Naimark, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in this case , the Board finds: 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. 2. The labor organizations involved claim to represent employees of the Employer. 3. No question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation - of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act, for the following reasons: The Petitioner seeks to represent a unit of office and cleri- cal employees of the Employer's Camden, New Jersey, plant. All parties stipulated to the appropriateness of the unit de- scribed as follows: All office and clerical employees of the Camden, New Jersey, plant of Radio Corporation of America, RCA Victor Division, including , but not limited to, all office and clerical employees engaged in timekeeping , purchasing and accounting activities for the Camden plant, but exclud- ing all employees employed by the home offices or general offices engaged in home office or general office activities, and excluding all executive , administrative and professional employees , all secretaries and confidential or managerial employees , all guards and all supervisors as defined in the Act. The Employer and the Intervenor, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, CIO, and its Local 110, contend that an existing collective -bargaining contract covering the employees in this unit bars the present proceedings. An appraisal of this contention requires consideration of several documents. On April 10, 1952, the Employer and the Intervenor Inter- national "for itself and in behalf of its affiliated RCA Victor Division locals " executed a national agreement . This agree- ment was signed by the Employer and by the Intervenor Inter- national . Its recognition clause reads: 107 NLRB No. 180. 994 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Paragraph 3.01 Recognition: The Company recognizes IUE as the sole collective bargaining agency with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours and other conditions of employment for all employees in those units where the IUE or any affiliated Local has been recognized, or shall be recognized through appropriate means satisfactory to both Parties as the sole collective bargaining agency. The units referred to above are set forth in the Appendix attached hereto and made part of this National Agreement. Any units for which IUE shall hereafter be recognized shall automatically be included and covered by this Agreement. (Emphasis supplied.) In addition to the national agreement , certain supplementary local agreements were executed whereby the Employer recog- nized various locals of the Intervenor International for speci- fied units of its employees and whereby the parties made certain provisions concerning local situations. One such sup- plementary agreement, introduced into the record, states the parties to the agreement as the Employer and "Local 103 of the International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, CIO." It is signed on behalf of the labor organization by "International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, CIO by Local 103 Negotiating Committee" and is approved by a representative of the Intervenor International. The national agreement and the supplementary local agree- ments were amended by a settlement agreement of May 15,1953, between the Employer and the Intervenor International "and Locals 103, 771, and 854." This settlement agreement, signed by the labor organization as "International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers CIO . . . by: IUE-RCA National Negotiating Committee" and approved by a representative of the Intervenor International, stated that the parties had nego- tiated pursuant to reopening provisions of the national agree- ment. It extended the termination date of the national agree- ment from June 1, 1954, to June 1, 1955. On July 20, 1953, a stipulation was executed covering the unit of office and clerical employees which the Petitioner seeks to represent in this case. The stipulation states that: WHEREAS, Local 110 of the International Union of Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, CIO, hereinafter referred to as "the Union," has demanded recognition as collective bargaining representative of certain em- ployees of Radio Corporation of America, RCA Victor Division, hereinafter referred to as "the Company," at the Company's Camden, New Jersey, Plant, and WHEREAS, upon the basis of evidence submitted by the Union, the Company has agreed to recognize the Union as collective bargaining agent of the employees hereinafter described, RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA, RCA VICTOR DIVISION 995 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED THAT: The Company recognizes the Union as the sole collective bargaining agency for all office and clerical employees of the Camden, New Jersey, Plant. . . . It was signed by "Local 110, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, CIO" and was approved by a representative of the Intervenor International . No local agree- ment covering the office and clerical unit was in existence at the time of the hearing in this case. The Petitioner made its claim of representation upon the Employer by letter dated July 27, 1953, and filed its petition on August 6, 1953, and an amended petition on August 26, 1953. The Employer and the Intervenors urge that upon the exe- cution of the stipulation the national agreement , pursuant to its recognition clause, automatically became applicable to the office and clerical unit covered by the stipulation, and bars the Petitioner's subsequent claim. The Petitioner opposes this contention, asserting that the stipulation did not provide that the terms of the national agreement be made part of the stipu- lation and that the stipulation and the national agreement were entered into by two separate labor organizations. Therefore, the Petitioner argues, the stipulation is a mere recognition agreement containing no terms and conditions of employment, and cannot bar a determination of representation. The Board has examined the documents involved in the light of the conflicting contentions of the parties. It has considered particularly the wording of the recognition clause of the national agreement and notes that the stipulation describes the Union involved in the stipulation as "Local 110 of the International Union of Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, CIO." The Board concludes that the clear intent of the parties to the national agreement as manifested by the terms of that contract was that it should become applicable to any unit for which the Intervenor International or one of its locals should be recog- nized. We, therefore, find that the national agreement became applicable to the office and clerical employees here involved on July 20, 1953, before the Petitioner made its claim for recog- nition. We must consider, then, the Petitioner's contention that the national agreement, if applicable to the employees involved, was not sufficiently complete to promote industrial peace and stability. The Petitioner asserts that fundamental elements of a labor-management agreement are omitted from the national agreement or left for negotiation at the local level. It further argues that the national agreement was designed to cover production and maintenance employees in the units inexistence at the time it was executed and is not adequate to include office and clerical employees whose interests and working conditions are completely dissimilar. So many terms affecting office and clerical employees will have to be negotiated by a sup- 996 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD plementary local agreement , the Petitioner urges, that the national agreement will not be the basic contract covering these employees. We cannot agree with the Petitioner's arguments. The national agreement is a 45-page document, containing 21 articles, dealing with most subjects customarily covered by bargaining contracts . It contains general policy provisions regarding strikes and lockouts , the rights of management, and discrimination . With respect to wages, it provides for a general wage increase , showup and call - in pay, overtime and holiday pay , and layoff allowances , it establishes a wage dif- ferential for certain shifts and provides for reopening of the contract for wage negotiations . It leaves for local negotiation the establishment of wage-rate schedules , wage rates for new occupational classifications , and wage provisions applicable to incentive work. Concerning hours of employment the national agreement defines the normal workweek and makes provision for the distribution of overtime work and the rates of payment therefor . The national agreement also establishes a detailed grievance procedure , setting up its various steps and the time and manner of presenting grievances . It leaves to supplementary local contracts the fixing of grievance districts , the selection of union representatives for handling grievances , and the drafting of grievance forms . The national agreement contains other provisions relating to seniority , holidays , vacations, and leaves of absences . By its terms , seniority districts and the maximum number of persons to be permitted leave for union activity at any one time, are to be set at the local level. The national agreement leaves the details of insurance programs entirely to local negotiations , but declares that the Employer shall provide and pay for such programs . Finally, the national agreement provides that local unions and local plant manage- ments may agree to modify local agreements "but such changes shall not deprive employees of any benefits of this national agreement." In view of the foregoing the Board is of the opinion that the national agreement which sets forth specific terms concerning a substantial number of subjects covered by collective - bargain- ing contracts and provides for negotiation of other subjects upon a local level, is sufficiently complete to constitute a contract barring a determination of representation.' Inasmuch as we are dismissing the petition on the ground of contract -bar, we shall not pass upon the Intervenors ' motion to dismiss on the ground that the unit sought at the hearing is substantially different from that sought in the original petition. [The Board dismissed the petition] 1 See Spartan Aircraft Company, 98 NLRB 73 ; Pillsbury Mills , Inc., 92 NLRB 72; Wilmington Terminal Warehouse Company , 68 NLRB 299; Pullman Standard Car Manufacturing Co., 51 NLRB 661. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation