Priscilla D. Holloway, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 13, 2003
01A35312_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 13, 2003)

01A35312_r

12-13-2003

Priscilla D. Holloway, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Priscilla D. Holloway v. United States Postal Service

01A35312

December 16, 2003

.

Priscilla D. Holloway,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A35312

Agency No. 1G-753-0105-03

DECISION

Upon review we find that the agency properly dismissed complainant's

complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1), for stating the same

claim pending before or previously decided by the agency or Commission.

In a June 29, 2003 formal complaint, complainant alleged that she

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of sex (female) and age

(D.O.B. 1/27/75) when: on May 3, 2003, complainant became aware that

a supervisor was tampering with documents on clocking employees in

the system and nothing happened to her whereas complainant was removed

from the agency effective October 23, 1998, for Unsatisfactory Services

when she allegedly used a stolen credit card that was purchased from an

individual in the private sector. The record reveals that on January 27,

2002, complainant filed a previous complaint (Agency No. 1G-753-0034-02)

in which she alleged that she was subject to discrimination when she

received a September 16, 1998 Notice of Removal which terminated her

position with the agency effective October 1998. The record reveals

that the agency dismissed Agency No. 1G-753-0034-02 for untimely EEO

Counselor contact which was upheld by the Office of Federal Operations in

EEOC Appeal No. 01A23767 (October 23, 2002). Therefore, as complainant

has previously raised the issue of her removal from the agency before

the Commission, she is precluded from raising the same matter in a

new complaint.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 13, 2003

__________________

Date