Portable Floor Makers, Ltd.v.Florlok USA, Inc.

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

Aug 2, 2000

No. 91092747re (T.T.A.B. Aug. 2, 2000)

Paper No. 95
PTH
THIS DISPOSITION IS NOT
CITABLE AS PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB 8/2/00
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
______
Portable Floor Makers, Ltd.
v.
Florlok USA, Inc.
_____
Opposition No. 92,747
to application Serial No. 74/373,406
filed on March 30, 1993
_____
Request for Reconsideration
_____
George F. Dvorak, Patricia A. Cigelnik and Keith Orum of
Dvorak & Orum for Portable Floor Makers, Ltd.
Louis Weinstein of Weinstein & Kimmelman for Florlok USA,
Inc.
______
Before Simms, Cissel and Hairston, Administrative Trademark
Judges.
Opinion by Hairston, Administrative Trademark Judge:
Florlok USA, Inc. (Florlok), on May 1, 2000, filed a
request for reconsideration of the Board’s March 30, 2000
decision sustaining the opposition. Florlok further
requests an oral rehearing, if permissible.
Opposition No. 92,747
2
Florlok is advised that it is not the practice of the
Board to hold an oral hearing on a request for
reconsideration. In view thereof, the request for an oral
rehearing is denied.
Also, inasmuch as Florlok has not set forth any basis
for its request for reconsideration,1 the request for
reconsideration is denied.
R. L. Simms
R. F. Cissel
P. T. Hairston
Administrative Trademark Judges
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

1 We note, in this regard, that the request for reconsideration
consists simply of the following: “Florlok USA, Inc., Applicant
in the above-identified Opposition, herewith requests
reconsideration of the decision dated March 30, 2000, issued
after final hearing. Applicant further requests an oral hearing,
if permissible.”