Port Arthur CollegeDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsNov 20, 195092 N.L.R.B. 152 (N.L.R.B. 1950) Copy Citation In the Matter of PORT ARTHUR COLLEGE, EMPLOYER and INTERNA- TIONAL, BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL 'PORKERS, AFL, PETITIONER Case No. 39-RC-224.-Decided November 20, 1950 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition, duly filed, . a hearing 7 was held before Chas., Y. Latimer, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at,^the hearing are free from prejudicial error- and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Murdock and Styles]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. Port Arthur College, herein called the Employer, is an educa- tional institution in Port Arthur, Texas, organized under the laws of the State of Texas as a nonprofit corporation. It conducts courses in business and radio studies, and is operated under the direction of the Board of Education of the Methodist Episcopal Church. The Employer also owns and operates a radio station with the call letters KPAC which is under license from the Federal Communications Com- mission. The broadcasting studio of the station is located on the college campus while its transmitter station is located 7 miles from the campus. This proceeding is concerned only with the employees attached to Station KPAC, which up to the present time has not been used by the Employer for instructional purposes in connection with its courses of study. Station KPAC is affiliated with the Mutual Broadcasting System. It utilizes the wire services of the Associated Press, the telephone serv- ices of the Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, and the time serv- ices of Western Union. Approximately 471/2 percent of the station's broadcasting time is devoted to national network or hook-up programs. The reception range of Station.KPAC extends into Louisiana. During the year preceding the date of the hearing, the gross revenues of Station KPAC from broadcasting amounted to $147,000, of which 75 percent, derived from the sale of services and broadcast time to advertising agencies and customers located outside the State of Texas. 92 NLRB No. 40. 152 :PORT . ARTHUR'. COLLEGE 153 The net earnings of Station KPAC are used. for the. upkeep and improvement of the buildings and facilities of the college. The Employer contends that the activities of its.radio station do not subject it to the Board's jurisdiction because the earnings of the station inure not to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals, but to the college which is an educational institution operated by the Methodist Church without profit. We do not agree with this conten- tion: It is beyond question that the Employer's broadcasting activities as carried on at Station KPAC are conducted on a commercial basis for profit. That these profits are used to further the cultural objectives of a nonprofit educational organization with religious affiliations does not in our opinion alter the business character of the station's activi- ties.' Accordingly, we find that as to the operation of Station KPAC, the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act 2 We further find in accordance with our recently announced policy in WBSR, Inc.,3 that it will effectuate the policies of the Act to assert jurisdiction in this case. 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain employees of the college. 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The petitioner seeks a unit composed of the transmitter station technicians of. Station KPAC. In the alternative, it requests that two units be established, one to consist of the transmitter station technicians and the other to consist of all the employees at the broad- casting studio of Station KPAC who operate and maintain the radio control equipment. The Employer, on the other hand, urges as appro- priate a single broad unit embracing both the transmitter station' employees and all the employees who operate and maintain the radio control equipment at the studio. As previously noted, the transmitter station of Station KPAC is 7 miles from the broadcasting studio which is located on the college campus. The transmitter station employs three technicians whose function it is to operate and maintain the radio transmitting equip- ment. These employees are required to be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission. The broadcasting studio employs six 1 Nor do we believe that these circumstances support the Employer's claim that it is not an employer within the meaning of the Act. Accordingly, we reject this claim and find on the facts before us that the Employer is an employer within the meaning of the Act. 2 Illinois Institute of Technology et al., 81 NLRB 201 ; Henry Ford Trade School,. 58 NLRB 1535 ; Polish National Alliance v. N . L. R. B., 322 U. S . 643, affirming 136 F. 175 (C. A. 7). 1 91 NLRB 630. 154 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD employees to operate and maintain the radio equipment in the control room, none of whom is licensed. These employees also work as an- nouncers while they are on duty in the control room. Of this' group, only three devote their full time to these dual functions. These three employees are hereinafter referred to as operator-announcers.4 The remaining three employees who devote only a part of their time to their operator-announcer duties are separately discussed infra. Although the operator-announcers and the transmitter station tech- nicians are not interchanged, they work closely with each other in order to achieve technical coordination. Both groups of employees are under the supervision of the chief engineer. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the Employer distinguishes between the transmitter station technicians and the operator-announcers with rega'rd to their general working conditions. In recent cases involving the broadcasting industry, the Board has found appropriate, units of transmitter station technicians and operator-announcers, especially, where, as here, the employees form a small closely knit group with common interests 5 Accordingly, we find that the transmitter station technicians and the, operator-an- nouncers of Station KPAC constitute an appropriate unit.' The remaining question to be decided is whether or not to include the three employees who function as operator-announcers only part of the time. These employees are Pinell, Baxter, and Swanson. Pinell spends 36 hours a week as an operator-announcer and devotes the balance of his time to selling activities. Baxter works as an op- erator-announcer for 101/2 hours per week and as a salesman for the remainder of the time. Swanson devotes 121/4 hours per week to his operator-announcer duties and divides the balance of his time between selling and writing continuity. As these employees are regularly assigned operator_announcer functions, we shall include them in the unit but only for the purpose of collective bargaining as to their operator-announcer work.7 We find that all the transmitter station technicians and all the broadcasting studio employees who work as operator-announcers at 4 These employees are Razza, Earl, and Vines. Although regularly employed, Razza works only about 221/2 hours per week at the studio. , Radio Station IVCIL, 86 NLRB 1302; Associated Electronic Enterprises, Inc., 80 NLRB 295 ; Western Gateway Broadcasting Corporation, 77 NLRB 49. 6 We find no merit in the Petitioner's claim that difference in mode of payment between the transmitter station technicians who are hourly paid and the operator-announcers who are paid a salary is a reliable criterion for determining how these employees shall be grouped. Geneva Forge, Inc., 90 NLRB No. 212; Wilson & Company, Inc., 64 NLRB 1124. 7 However, as Baxter and Swanson spend less than one-half their time in work which qualifies them to be in the unit, we find that they are not eligible to vote in the election hereinafter directed. Ridson, Inc. Radio Station WDSM, 91 NLRB No. 59; Delaware Broadcasting Company, 82 NLRB 727. PORT ARTHUR COLLEGE 155 the Employer's radio station KPAC in Port Arthur , Texas, excluding all other employees and all supervisors as defined in the Act , constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. [Text of Direction of Election omitted from publication in this volume.] Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation