POH Medical Center

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 22, 2000

331 N.L.R.B. 451 (N.L.R.B. 2000)

POH MEDICAL CENTER 451
Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital d/b/a POH Medical
Center and International Union, United Auto-
mobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Workers of
America (UAW), AFL–CIO. Case 7–CA–42923
June 22, 2000
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN TRUESDALE AND MEMBERS FOX
AND BRAME
Pursuant to a charge and an amended charge filed on
March 30 and April 13, 2000, respectively, the General
Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued a
complaint on April 17, 2000, alleging that the Respon-
dent has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National
Labor Relations Act by refusing the Union’s request to
bargain and to furnish information following the Union’s
certification in Case 7–RC–21183. (Official notice is
taken of the “record” in the representation proceeding as
defined in the Board’s Rules and Regulations, Secs.
102.68 and 102.69(g); Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343
(1982).) The Respondent filed an answer admitting in
part and denying in part the allegations in the complaint.
On May 15, 2000, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment. On May 17, 2000, the Board
issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board
and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not
be granted. The Respondent filed a response.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
In its answer the Respondent admits its refusal to bar-
gain and to furnish information, but attacks the validity
of the certification on the basis of its objections to con-
duct alleged to have affected the results of the election
and its contention in the representation proceeding that
its registered and charge nurses are statutory supervisors
and should therefore be excluded from the unit. In addi-
tion, the Respondent, in its answer denies that the infor-
mation requested by the Union is necessary and relevant.
All representation issues raised by the Respondent were or
could have been litigated in the prior representation pro-
ceeding. The Respondent does not offer to adduce at a hear-
ing any newly discovered and previously unavailable evi-
dence, nor does it allege any special circumstances that
would require the Board to reexamine the decision made in
the representation proceeding. We therefore find that the
Respondent has not raised any representation issue that is
properly litigable in this unfair labor practice proceeding.
See Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162
(1941).
We also find there are no factual issues warranting a
hearing regarding the Union’s request for information.
The complaint alleges, and the Respondent admits, that
the Union requested the following information from the
Respondent.
A list of all employees covered by the bargaining unit,
their addresses, social security numbers, classifications,
dates of hire, wage scales as well as copies of all benefit
plans, and summary plan descriptions. It is well estab-
lished that, with the exception of employee social secu-
rity numbers, such information is presumptively relevant
for purposes of collective bargaining and must be fur-
nished on request.1
Accordingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judg-
ment and will order the Respondent to bargain with the
Union and to furnish the Union with the information it
requested, with the exception of employee social security
numbers.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a nonprofit
Michigan corporation with an office and facility in
Pontiac, Michigan (the Pontiac facility), has been en-
gaged in the operation of an acute care hospital.
During the calendar year ending December 31, 1999,
the Respondent, in conducting its operations, derived
gross revenues in excess of $250,000 and purchased
goods and materials valued in excess of $50,000 from
points located outside the State of Michigan, and caused
said goods and materials to be shipped directly to its
Pontiac facility.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organization
within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the election held March 19, 1998, the Union
was certified on September 14, 1999, as the exclusive

1 The Board has held that employee social security numbers are not
presumptively relevant and that the Union must therefore demonstrate
the relevance of such information. See, e.g., Dexter Fastener Tech-
nologies, 321 NLRB 612 (1996); and Maple View Manor, 320 NLRB
1149 (1996). Here, the record fails to indicate why the Union wanted
the social security numbers or otherwise establish the relevance of the
numbers. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the Respondent was
obligated to provide the numbers to the Union. This does not excuse
the Respondent’s failure to supply all of the other information re-
quested by the Union. In its answer, the Respondent denies that this
requested information is necessary for and relevant to the Union’s
performance of its duties. We note, however, that the description of the
information sought on its face relates directly to the wages, hours, and
terms and conditions of employment of the unit employees and we so
find. In addition, the Respondent has not attempted to rebut the rele-
vance of the information in response to the Notice to Show Cause.
Accordingly, we find that the Respondent’s denial does not raise any
issues warranting a hearing and the Respondent’s failure to provide the
information on request violated Sec. 8(a)(5) of the Act. See Maple
View Manor, 320 NLRB 1149 (1996); Trustees of Masonic Hall, 261
NLRB 436 (1982); and Mobay Chemical Corp., 233 NLRB 109 (1997).
331 NLRB No. 62
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD 452
collective-bargaining representative of the employees in
the following appropriate unit:
All full-time, regular part-time, and contingent RNs
and charge nurse RNs employed by Respondent at its
facility located at 50 N. Perry Street, Pontiac, Michi-
gan; but excluding physicians, skilled maintenance
employees, technical employees, other professional
employees, business office clerical employees, mana-
gerial employees including case managers and nurse
educators, non-professional employees, guards and
supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other em-
ployees.
The Union continues to be the exclusive representative un-
der Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
On December 9, 1999, the Union, by letter, requested
the Respondent to bargain and to furnish information,
and since December 14, 1999, the Respondent has failed
and refused. We find that this failure and refusal consti-
tutes an unlawful refusal to bargain in violation of Sec-
tion 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By failing and refusing on and after December 14,
1999, to bargain with the Union as the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of employees in the ap-
propriate unit and to furnish the Union requested infor-
mation, with the exception of employee social security
numbers, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor
practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Sec-
tion 8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union, and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement. We also shall order the Respon-
dent to furnish the Union the information requested, with
the exception of employee social security numbers.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by the law, we shall construe the initial period of the cer-
tification as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); Burnett Construction Co.,
149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57 (10th
Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Pontiac Osteopathic Hospital d/b/a POH
Medical Center, Pontiac, Michigan, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain with International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Workers of America, (UAW), AFL–CIO as the exclusive
bargaining representative of the employees in the bar-
gaining unit, and refusing to furnish the Union informa-
tion that is relevant and necessary to its role as the exclu-
sive bargaining representative of the unit employees.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the following appro-
priate unit on terms and conditions of employment, and if
an understanding is reached, embody the understanding
in a signed agreement:
All full-time, regular part-time, and contingent RNs
and charge nurse RNs employed by Respondent at its
facility located at 50 N. Perry Street, Pontiac, Michi-
gan; but excluding physicians, skilled maintenance
employees, technical employees, other professional
employees, business office clerical employees, mana-
gerial employees including case managers and nurse
educators, non-professional employees, guards and
supervisors as defined in the Act, and all other em-
ployees.
(b) Furnish the Union the information that it requested
on December 9, 1999, with the exception of employee
social security numbers.
(c) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Pontiac, Michigan, copies of the attached
notice marked “Appendix.”2 Copies of the notice, on
forms provided by the Regional Director for Region 7,
after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized repre-
sentative, shall be posted by the Respondent and main-
tained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places
including all places where notices to employees are cus-
tomarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the
Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material. In the event
that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the Re-
spondent has gone out of business or closed the facility
involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall du-
plicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the notice
to all current employees and former employees employed
by the Respondent at any time since December 14, 1999.
(d) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-

2 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
POH MEDICAL CENTER 453
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.

MEMBER BRAME, dissenting.
In the underlying representation proceeding, I dis-
sented from my colleagues’ denial of the Employer’s
request for review of the Regional Director’s determina-
tion that the Employer’s charge nurses were employees
and not statutory supervisors. Accordingly, I dissent
here from my colleagues’ granting the General Counsel’s
Motion for Summary Judgment and their finding that the
Employer violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board
An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to
post and abide by this notice.

WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain with International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural
Workers of America, (UAW), AFL–CIO as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the bargaining unit,
and WE WILL NOT refuse to furnish the Union
information that is relevant and necessary to its role as
the exclusive bargaining representative of the unit
employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put
in writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the bar-
gaining unit:
All full-time, regular part-time, and contingent RNs
and charge nurse RNs employed by us at our facility
located at 50 N. Perry Street, Pontiac, Michigan; but
excluding physicians, skilled maintenance employees,
technical employees, other professional employees,
business office clerical employees, managerial employ-
ees including case managers and nurse educators, non-
professional employees, guards and supervisors as de-
fined in the Act, and all other employees.
WE WILL furnish the Union the information it requested
on December 9, 1999, with the exception of employee
social security numbers.
PONTIAC OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL
D/B/A POH MEDICAL CENTER