Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsDec 16, 194880 N.L.R.B. 1331 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS COMPANY, COLUMBIA CHEM- ICAL DIVISION, EMPLOYER and ALLIED CHEMICAL AND ALKALI WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL No. 1, PETITIONER Case No. 8-RC-270.-Decided December 16, 1948 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Barber- ton, Ohio, on September 30, 1948, before Charles A. Fleming, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. 1 Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-man panel consisting of the undersigned Board Members.* Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The Petitioner and the Intervenor are labor organizations which claim to represent certain employees of the Employer. 3. The question concerning representation : On June 27, 1948, the Intervenor and the Employer entered into a. collective bargaining agreement to terminate on June 27, 1950. On August 7, 1948, the officers of Local 13013 called a special meeting of the local, duly noticed, and a vote was taken to disaffiliate from the Intervenor, surrender the charter and dissolve the local. At the same meeting the members voted to organize Local No. 1, Allied Chemical and Alkali Workers of America, the Petitioner herein, now claiming to be the successor to Local 13013. Of the 1,600 employees at the plant and mine of the Employer approximately 1,100 were dues-paying mem- bers of the Petitioner at the time of the hearing. The former officers 1 Local 13013, District 50, affiliated with the United Mine Workers of America , herein- after called the Intervenor, was allowed to intervene at the hearing by the hearing officer on the ground of a contract between the Intervenor and the Employer. *Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Murdock. 80 N. L. R. B., No. 204. 1331 817319-49-vol. 80-85 1332 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD of the Intervenor became the newly elected officers of the Petitioner. The former office of the Intervenor has been taken over by the Peti- tioner, and regular meetings are held. The Intervenor conceded at the hearing that it had no officers or dues-paying members at the Em- ployer's plant or mine and that it had no office at Barberton, Ohio, and held no meetings. However, the Intervenor's representative at the hearing stated that Local 13013 was still in existence, and that it had established an office at Akron, Ohio, and was prepared to handle grievances of the Employer's employees. The Petitioner by letter dated August 14, 1948, requested recognition by the Employer as the exclusive bargaining representative of the employees. In a letter dated August 16, 1948, the Employer refused to recognize the Peti- tioner. The Intervenor contends that its existing contract with the Employer is a bar to the instant petition. We find no merit in this contention. It is clear on the foregoing facts that there exists a doubt as to the identity of the labor organiza- tion that the employees desire to represent them which can best be resolved by an election. Under such circumstances we have held that an existing contract does not constitute a bar to a present de- termination of representatives.' We find that a question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, we find that all employees of the Employer's plant and limestone mine at Barberton, Ohio, working on hourly rates, including group leaders who work on hourly rates of pay, but excluding salaried employees and supervisors within the meaning of the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION 3 As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co., Columbia Chemical Division, Barberton, Ohio, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty ' See Matter of Olive & Myers Manufacturing Company, 59 N. L . R. B. 650; Matter of Revere Copper & Brass, Incorporated, 67 N. L. R. B. 1114 ; Matter of Carson Pirie Scott & Company, 69 N. L. R. B. 935; Matter of Foley Lumber & Export Corporation, 70 N. L. R. B. 73 ; Matter of Riggs Optical Company, Consolidated , 77 N. L. R. B. 265. $ Having failed to achieve compliance or to initiate steps for compliance with the filing requirements of Section 9 (f), (g), and ( h) of the amended Act, the Intervenor will not be accorded a place on the ballot. See Matter of Cardinal Products, Inc., 80 N. L. R. B. 113 PITTSBURGH PLATE GLASS COMPANY 1333 (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Eighth Region, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, as amended, among the em- ployees in the unit found appropriate in paragraph numbered 4, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or rein- stated prior to the date of the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by Local No. 1, Allied Chemical and Alkali Workers of America, for the purposes of collective bargaining. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation