Piedmont Leaf Tobacco Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 6, 194983 N.L.R.B. 1148 (N.L.R.B. 1949) Copy Citation In the Matter of PIEDMONT LEAF TOBACCO COMPANY, EMPLOYER and UNITED TRANSPORT SERVICE EMPLOYEES, CIO, PETITIONER Case No. 34-RC-124.-Decided June 6, 1949 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before Howard A. McIntyre, hearing officer of the National Labor Relations Board. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Gray]. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 2..The labor organization named below claims to represent certain employees of the Employer.- 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of certain employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The following employees of the Employer constitute a unit appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act: All production and maintenance employees at the Employer's Win- ston-Salem, North Carolina, plant, excluding all office and clerical employees, tobacco buyers, truck drivers, mechanics, and all guards, professional employees, and supervisors, as defined in the Act.2 5. The Employer's tobacco leaf processing operation at its Winston- Salem, North Carolina, plant, is seasonal in nature, with the peak of the plant's productive season invariably being ushered in, sometime 1 United Tobacco Workers, Local 22 , C. I. O , also claiming to represent certain employees of the Employer, attempted to intervene in the proceeding but was properly excluded there- from when it failed to show either an existing contractual interest , or that it had ever been In compliance with Section 9 of the Act. 2 The unit found appropriate is substantially the one agreed upon by the parties. 83 N. L . R. B., No. 164. 1148 PIEDMONT LEAF TOBACCO COMPANY 1149 in September, by the opening of the Winston-Salem tobacco market. We shall, therefore, in order to make the franchise available to as great a number of affected and interested employees as possible, direct that an election be held at or about the peak of the plant's next produc- tive season on such date as the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard shall determine, among the employees in the appropriate unit who are employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the issuance of notice of the election by the Regional Director. DIRECTION OF ELECTION 3 As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with the Employer, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted on a date to be selected by the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard subject to the instructions set forth in paragraph numbered 5, above, under the direction and supervision of said Regional Director, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, as amended, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in paragraph numbered 4, above, who are em- ployed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the issuance of notice of election by the Regional Director, includ- ing employees who do not work during said pay-roll period because they are ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who will have quit or will have been discharged for cause and will not have been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether they desire to be represented, for purposes of collective bargaining, by United Transport Service Employees, CIO, or by United Tobacco Workers, Local 22, Food, Tobacco, Agricultural and Allied Workers of America, CIO, or by neither. 8 Since issuance of the above Decision, the Intervenor has complied with Section 9 (f), (g), and (h) of the Act. The Board, therefore, by Order dated September 6, 1949, accords the Intervenor a place on the ballot. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation