Peyton Packing Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 10, 194350 N.L.R.B. 355 (N.L.R.B. 1943) Copy Citation I/ In the Matter of PEYTON PACKING COMPANY, INC. and AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF N. A., A. F. OF L., LOCAL #606 Case No. C-2466.-Decided June 10, 1943 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION AND ORDER' On May 18, 1943, the National Labor Relations Board issued a -a Decision and Order in the above-entitled proceeding.' On May 29, 1943, Peyton Packing Company, Inc., filed a Petition for Reconsid- eration of Board's Decision, which the Board has considered. The motion for reconsideration, insofar as it is inconsistent with the Order hereinafter set forth, is hereby denied. IT Is HEREBY ORDERED that the Decision be, and the same hereby is, amended by striking the second paragraph in Section V and substi- tuting therefor the following : We have found that the respondent discriminated in regard to the hire and tenure of employment of Gregorio Alarcon, George Arciniaga, Manuel Barreda, Nazario Diaz, Eugenio Lopez, L. J. Mena, Eduardo Ochoterena, Manuel Quintana, and Manuel Ren- teria. In order to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Act, we shall order that the respondent offer to all the foregoing 'persons, except L. J. Mena and Eduardo Ochoterena, immediate and full reinstatement to their former or substantially equivalent positions, without prejudice to their seniority and other rights and privileges, and make them whole for any loss of pay they may have suffered by reason of the discrimination by payment to each of them, excepting L. J. Mena and Eduardo Ochoterena, of a sum of money equal to the amount he normally would have earned as wages during the period from the date of the discrim- ination against him to the date of the offer of reinstatement, less . 11 3 48 N. L. A B. 828. 50 N. L. R. B., No. 51. 355, 356 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD" his net earnings 2 during such period. , In accordance with our usual practice, the period from the date of the Intermediate Re- port to, the date of the Order herein will be excluded in computing the amount of whatever back pay each of the employees discrim- inated against is entitled to have, since the Trial Examiner did not recommend their reinstatement with back pay.3 L. J. Mena and Eduardo Ochoterena disclaimed any desire to be reinstated. We shall consequently not direct that they be restored to their employment, but we shall order the respondent to-make L. T Mena and Eduardo Ochoterena whole for any loss of pay they may have suffered by reason of the discrimination by payment to each of them of a sum of money equal to the amount he nor- mally would have earned as wages during the period from the date of the discrimination against him to the date upon which he secured the position he held at the time of the hearing, less his net earnings during such period. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the Order be, and the same hereby is, amended by striking therefrom Paragraphs 2 (a), (b), (c), and (d), and substituting therefor the following: 2. Take the following affirmative action, which the, Board finds will effectuate the policies of the Act : (a) Offer to Gregorio Alarcon, George Arciniaga, Manuel Barreda, Nazario Diaz, Eugenio Lopez, Manuel Quintana, and Manuel Renteria immediate and full reinstatement to their, former or substantially equivalent positions, without prejudice to their seniority and other rights and privileges; (b) Make whole each of the employees named in the preceding paragraph for any loss of pay he may have suffered by reason of the respondent's discrimination against him, by payment to him of a sum of money equal to the amount which he normally would have earned as wages during the period from the date of the respondent's discrimination against him to the date of the Inter- mediate Report herein and during the period from the date of this Order,to the date of the respondent's offer of reinstatement, less his net earnings during such periods; (c),Make whole L. J. Mena and Eduardo Ochoterena for any loss of pay they may have suffered by reason of the respondent's 2 By "net earnings" is meant earnings less expenses , such as for transportation, room, and board incurred by an employee in connection with obtaining work and working else- where than for the respondent , which would not have been incurred but for his unlawful discharge and the consequent necessity of his seeking employment elsewhere See Matter of Crossett Lumber Company and United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of Amer- ica, Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union, Local 2590, S N . L R B 440 . Monies received for work performed upon Federal, State , county , municipal , or other work-relief projects shall be considered as earnings See Republic Steel Corporation v. N L. R B ., 311 U. S. 7 3 Cf Matter of E R Haffelfinper Company, Inc and United 1Va7l Pape ,* Crafts of North America . Local No 6, 1 N L. R B 760, PEYTON PACKING COMPANY, INC. ,;357 discrimination against them, by payment to each of them of a sum of money equal to the amount which he normally would have earned as wages during the period from the date of the respond- ent's discrimination against him to the date upon which he secured the position he held at the time of the hearing, less his net earn- ings during such period; , (d) Post immediately in conspicuous places at its El Paso, Texas, plant, and maintain for a period of at least sixty (60) consecutive days from the date of posting, notices in English and 'in Spanish to its employees stating: (1) that the respondent will not engage in the conduct from which it is ordered to cease and desist in paragraphs 1 (a) and (b) of this Order; (2)' that the respondent will take the affirmative action set forth in paragraphs 2 (a), (b), and (c) of this Order; and (3) that its employees are free to remain or become members of Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, Local #606, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, and that the respondent will not discriminate against any employee because of membership or activity in that organization; (e) Notify the Regional Director for the Sixteenth Region in ,writing within ten (10) days from, the date of this Order, what steps the respondent has taken to comply, herewith. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Decision and Order, as printed, shall appear as hereby amended. Mr. JOHN -M. Hous,roN took no part in the consideration of the above Supplemental Decision and Order. 536105-44-24 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation