Petra Rezac, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 16, 2011
0120093232 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 16, 2011)

0120093232

03-16-2011

Petra Rezac, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Western Area), Agency.


Petra Rezac,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Western Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01-2009-3232

Agency No. 1E-982-0017-09

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated June 26, 2009, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Mail-handler at the Agency's bulk mail center in Tacoma, Washington. On June 1, 2009, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian), national origin (German), sex (female), and age (48) when, on February 19, 2009, a Supervisor sought to conduct an investigative interview of Complainant regarding an allegation by a coworker, never completed an investigation of allegations by Complainant against the same coworker, and did not listen to Complainant's side of the story regarding an incident between the two.

On June 26, 2009, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. The Agency concluded that Complainant failed to allege a personal loss or harm with respect to a term, condition or privilege of employment, or actions that were sufficiently severe or pervasive. The Agency found that Complainant was not aggrieved by the alleged actions. The instant appeal from Complainant followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under EEOC regulations because Complainant failed to show that she suffered harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). A comprehensive review of the record shows that Complainant did not suffer any adverse employment action as a result of the actions alleged here. Moreover, we find that the claims, even if proven to be true and viewed in a light most favorable to Complainant, would not indicate that Complainant has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request no. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).

Based on the above, we AFFIRM the Agency's decision dismissing the instant complaint.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_March 16, 2011

Date

2

01-2009-3232

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

01-2009-3232