Paul L. Walker, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Army & Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 2, 2001
01A12050_r (E.E.O.C. May. 2, 2001)

01A12050_r

05-02-2001

Paul L. Walker, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Army & Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES), Agency.


Paul L. Walker v. Department of Defense (AAFES)

01A12050

May 2, 2001

.

Paul L. Walker,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

Army & Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A12050

Agency No. 00.129

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated

January 5, 2001, dismissing complainant's complaint due to untimely

EEO Counselor contact is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was terminated effective

March 31, 2000. The record indicates that complainant contacted an EEO

Counselor with regard to his complaint on June 8, 2000, which was beyond

the 45-day time limit set by the regulations. Although complainant

contends that he did not know about the requisite time limit to contact

an EEO Counselor during the relevant time period, the agency provides

an affidavit from a Human Resources Manager indicating that EEO posters

containing the requisite time period for initiating EEO contact were on

display at the relevant time in complainant's work area indicating that

complainant had constructive knowledge of the 45-day time limit at the

time of the alleged incident. See Thompson v. Department of the Army,

EEOC Request 05910474 (September 12, 1991). Thus, the Commission finds

that complainant fails to present adequate justification to warrant an

extension of the applicable time limit for contacting an EEO Counselor.

Accordingly, the agency's decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 2, 2001

__________________

Date