Paul J. Colander, Complainant,v.William S. Cohen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 21, 2000
05a00039 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 21, 2000)

05a00039

04-21-2000

Paul J. Colander, Complainant, v. William S. Cohen, Secretary, U.S. Department of Defense (Defense Finance & Accounting Service), Agency.


Paul J. Colander v. U.S. Department of Defense

05A00039

April 21, 2000

Paul J. Colander, )

Complainant, )

) Request No. 05A00039

v. ) Appeal No. 01975163

) Agency No. DFAS-CO-0000A-96

William S. Cohen, ) Hearing No. 220-97-5009X

Secretary, )

U.S. Department of Defense )

(Defense Finance & Accounting Service), )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On 10/6/99, Paul J. Colander (complainant) initiated a request to the

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Commission) to reconsider

the decision in Paul J. Colander v. Department of Defense, EEOC Appeal

No. 01975163 (9/9/99).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commissioners

may, in their discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision.

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b)). The party

requesting reconsideration must demonstrate that the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

the decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices

or operations of the agency. Complainant's request is denied.

After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds complainant's

request does not meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is

the decision of the Commission to deny complainant's request. Complainant

failed to establish that the prior decision, which found he was not

discriminated against when he was not selected for a Supervisory Auditor

position in December 1995, involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of

material law or fact. Instead, the complainant argues that the selecting

official has a history of selecting unqualified individuals for positions.

Furthermore, he argues that he does have "extensive" auditing experience

required for the position. However, we find no indication that the prior

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of law or fact.

The decision of the Commission in EEOC Appeal No. 01975163 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal from a decision of the Commission on a request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P1199)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 21, 2000

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.