Paul C. Traver, Jr., Complainant,v.Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 7, 2010
0120101988 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 7, 2010)

0120101988

06-07-2010

Paul C. Traver, Jr., Complainant, v. Gary Locke, Secretary, Department of Commerce, (Bureau of the Census), Agency.


Paul C. Traver, Jr.,

Complainant,

v.

Gary Locke,

Secretary,

Department of Commerce,

(Bureau of the Census),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120101988

Agency No. 10-63-00403D

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency in its final decision

dated March 15, 2010, properly dismissed complainant's complaint

for failure to state a claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1).

The record indicates that complainant filed his complaint, dated February

24, 2010, alleging discrimination based on disability (disabled veteran)

when: (1) on January 12, 2010, he learned during a telephone conversation

with an agency employee that the agency failed to hire him for an

unspecified position; and (2) on February 2, 2010, he was mistreated by

an unidentified individual in the agency EEO office when that individual

called him regarding the instant complaint and told him to stop screaming

or he would hang up and proceeded to hang up on complainant. The record

indicates that on January 28, 2010, complainant was subsequently offered

and accepted a Crew Leader Assistant position at the agency.

After a review of the record, we find that complainant clearly alleged

discrimination based on his veterans status or preference but claimed

no specific disability within the purview EEO regulations. In fact,

complainant claimed that the alleged discrimination was based

on the agency's failure to follow established Office of Personnel

Management hiring guidelines for employment, i.e., not hiring veterans.

Veteran's status is not protected under statutes enforced by the EEOC.

In addition, we note that complainant, for the first time on appeal,

may be indicating that he was discriminated against on the basis of age.

The Commission finds that the complaint did not contain the claim of age

discrimination and therefore this basis is not part of the complaint.

In the instant circumstance, it is too late to add such a basis. Based on

the foregoing, we find that complainant failed to provide a basis within

the purview of the regulations. Complainant has not otherwise challenged

the definition of the complaint.

We also note that during the incident described in claim (2),

complainant indicated that he told the identified individual that he

always talked loud because he had a hearing problem. We find that this

claim merely alleged his dissatisfaction with the agency's processing

of his complaint and is therefore properly dismissed pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(8). To the extent this claim did not concern agency

processing of the EEO complaint, we find that the incident, if true, is

not sufficiently severe so as to render complainant aggrieved or state

a claim of harassment. Therefore, claim (2) is also properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1).

The agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is

AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

6/7/10

__________________

Date

2

0120101988

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013