01a01785
02-16-2000
Patricia L. Hartwell, Complainant, v. William M. Daley, Secretary, Department of Commerce, Agency.
Patricia L. Hartwell v. Department of Commerce
01A01785
February 16, 2000
Patricia L. Hartwell, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01A01785
) Agency No. 99-63-00836D
William M. Daley, )
Secretary, )
Department of Commerce, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
The instant matter is being processed following the implementation of
a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) entered into by the agency, the
Bureau of the Census, and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission.<1> The MOU was entered into in order to process complaints
arising from the 2000 Decennial Census more effectively and efficiently.
Pursuant to the MOU, individuals file their complaints directly with
the Commission. The Commission, through its Washington, D.C. Field
Office, then conducts an early assessment of complaints and neutral
evaluation of cases. The Washington, D.C. Field Office of the Commission
establishes a record of the complaint by obtaining an affidavit from the
complainant and by contacting an agency official to obtain the necessary
information on the complaint. Based on the record established by the
Washington, D.C. Field Office, the Washington, D.C. Field Office will:
(1) notify the agency that the individual has elected not to file a
formal complaint; (2) issue a decision dismissing the complaint and
notify the complainant or his or her right to appeal the decision to
the Office of Federal Operations; (3) conduct settlement negotiations;
or (4) notify the complainant that the complaint has been accepted and
forward the complaint to the agency for further investigation.
In the instant matter the Washington, D.C. Field Office of the Commission
issued a decision signed on November 16, 1999, dismissing the instant
complaint for failing to state a claim. The complaint was defined in the
prior decision as alleging discrimination on the bases of sex (female),
age, and disability. The prior decision found that complainant's
claim regarding her veteran's disability status does not fall under the
jurisdiction of the Rehabilitation Act. On appeal, complainant states
that she is only alleging a hostile work environment based on sex and age.
Complainant explains that she only wanted to inform the Commission that
veterans were being discriminated against. Therefore, we find that the
prior decision's dismissal of the basis of disability discrimination is
not at issue in this appeal.
In her complaint, complainant makes many references to discrimination in
her office against veterans. These assertions do not aid in establishing
a hostile work environment based on complainant's sex or age. Based on
the complaint itself and the statement by the complainant gathered by
the EEOC during the EEOC's neutral and independent evaluation of the
complaint, the Commission agrees with the earlier decision's finding that
complainant's claim of sex and age discrimination is insufficient, as a
whole, to state a claim and is properly dismissed for failing to state a
claim pursuant to the regulations set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37656
(to be codified and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)).
The incidents cited by complainant do not rise to a level necessary to
state a claim of harassment. Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC
Request No. 05970077 (Mar. 13, 1997). Even if the incidents described
by complainant in the complaint and affidavit were severe or frequent,
the Commission agrees with the previous decision's conclusion that
complainant has failed to show that the incidents at issue were related
to her age and sex.
The Washington, D.C. Field Office's decision dismissing the complaint
is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1199)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS
OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405). All requests and arguments must be
submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the
absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed
timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration
of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)
(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604).
The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the
other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS
THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
February 16, 2000
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that
the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
_____________________ _________________________
Date Equal Employment Assistant
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.