Parks Food ServiceDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMay 4, 1978235 N.L.R.B. 1410 (N.L.R.B. 1978) Copy Citation DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Ira Parks, Jr., d/b/a Parks Food Service and Robert C. Kirk, Petitioner and National Maritime Union of America, AFL-CIO-ITPE Division. Case 23- UD-I May 4, 1978 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF SECOND ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN FANNING AND MEMBERS JENKINS AND TRUESDALE Pursuant to a Stipulation for Certification Upon Consent Election approved by the Regional Director for Region 23 on April 29, 1977, an election by secret ballot was conducted on May 17, 1977, under his direction and supervision among the employees in the appropriate unit. At the conclusion of the election, the parties were furnished with a tally of ballots which showed that there were approximately 51 eligible voters and 47 cast ballots, of which 47 were in favor of, and none against, withdrawing the authority of the bargaining representative to require, under its agreement with the Employer, that mem- bership in the Union be a condition of employment. Thereafter, the Union filed a timely objection to conduct affecting the results of the election. Pursuant to Section 102.69 of the National Labor Relations Board's Rules and Regulations, Series 8, as amended, the Regional Director conducted an inves- tigation and, on June 13, 1977, issued and duly served on the parties his report in which he recom- mended that the Union's objection be overruled. Thereafter, the Union filed timely exceptions to the Regional Director's report. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act, and it will effectuate the purposes of the Act to assert jurisdiction herein. 2. The labor organization involved claims to represent certain employees of the Employer. 3. The Board has considered the entire record in this proceeding, including the Union's objection, the Regional Director's report, and the Union's excep- tions,' and hereby adopts the Regional Director's ' In its exceptions, the Union alleged for the first time that the Employer interfered with the election by unilaterally halting contnbutions to a health and welfare fund. The Board has long held that it will not consider, as objectionable, conduct which neither was alleged in a timely filed objection, nor was discovered by a Regional Director during the course of his investigation of such an objection. See Hecla Mining Company, 218 NLRB 860 (f175). Accordingly, we reject the Union's contention as untimely raised. 235 NLRB No. 191 findings and recommendations only to the extent consistent herewith. Briefly, the facts are as follows. On February 3, 1977, the instant deauthorization election petition was filed. Thereafter, the Employer posted and distributed to its employees a notice which stated: February 17, 1977 TO ALL EMPLOYEES OF PARKS FOOD SERVICE KELLY AFB, TX. It has come to our attention that union repre- sentatives have been threatening our employees that unless they join the Union, they will be discharged from employment with Parks Food Service. At the present time, there is pending before the National Labor Relations Board a petition filed by certain of our employees requesting an elec- tion to revoke the Union Security Clause con- tained in the N.M.U. contract. In light of that petition, we regard as coercive and unlawful any attempt by the union to force you to join the union. In any event, until the Labor Board has resolved the issues now pending before it, we do not intend to discharge or otherwise discriminate against any of our employees because of their refusal to join the union. /s/ Ira Parks, Jr. Ira Parks Jr. Parks Food Service Kelly AFB, Tx. This notice was the basis of a complaint issued on April 4, 1977, in Case 23-CA-6379, charging the Employer with violations of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act. The apparent theory of the complaint is that the notice constituted an unlawful repudiation of the union-security clause of the collective-bargaining agreement.2 Prior to the election, the Regional Director request- ed authority to process the instant petition notwith- standing the pending unfair labor practice proceed- ing. By telegram dated April 5, 1977, the Board, with Chairman Fanning dissenting, granted the Regional Director's request. As stated above, the election was held on May 17, 1977. 2 The Board has been administratively advised that on November 17, 1977, the parties entered into an informal settlement agreement in this matter and that, after an appropriate notice had been posted from November 22, 1977, to January 22, 1978, the Regional Director closed the case on compliance on February 17, 1978. 1410 PARKS FOOD SERVICE In its objection, the Union alleged that the Em- ployer's notice prevented the holding of a fair election. The Regional Director concluded that the issue of the effect of the notice on employee free choice was resolved by the Board when it authorized the Regional Director to conduct the election. Accordingly, he recommended that the objection be overruled. The Board has carefully reconsidered this issue, particularly in view of the contentions advanced in the Union's exceptions, and now finds that the Regional Director's request for authority to proceed with the election was improvidently granted. In our judgment, the employees--in light of the Employer's having repudiated and eliminated the union-security clause prior to the election-could not make a free and untrammeled choice as to whether to retain the clause. Under these circumstances, we cannot find that the employees were able to exercise a free choice in the election. Accordingly, we hereby sustain the Union's objection and set aside the election, and we shall direct that a second election be held at such time as the Regional Director deems appropriate. [Direction of Second Election and Excelsior foot- note omitted from publication.] 1411 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation