Pace University

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Aug 31, 2006

347 N.L.R.B. 115 (N.L.R.B. 2006)

347 NLRB No. 115
Pace University and New York State United Teachers.
Case 2-CA-37664
August 31, 2006
DECISION AND ORDER
BY MEMBERS LIEBMAN, SCHAUMBER, AND KIRSANOW
This is a refusal-to-bargain case in which the Respon-
dent is contesting the Union’s certification as bargaining
representative in the underlying representation proceed-
ing. Pursuant to a charge filed on May 15, 2006, the
General Counsel issued the complaint on May 22, 2006,
alleging that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act by refusing the Union’s request to bar-
gain following the Union’s certification in Case 2–RC–
23032. (Official notice is taken of the “record” in the
representation proceeding as defined in the Board’s
Rules and Regulations, Secs. 102.68 and 102.69(g);
Frontier Hotel, 265 NLRB 343 (1982).) The Respondent
filed an answer, admitting in part and denying in part the
allegations in the complaint and asserting an affirmative
defense.
On June 19, 2006, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment. On June 21, 2006, the Board
issued an order transferring the proceeding to the Board
and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not
be granted. The Respondent filed a response.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its
authority in this proceeding to a three-member panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
The Respondent admits its refusal to bargain, but con-
tests the validity of the certification on the basis of its
objections to conduct alleged to have affected the results
of the election in the representation proceeding.
All representation issues raised by the Respondent
were or could have been litigated in the prior representa-
tion proceeding. The Respondent does not offer to ad-
duce at a hearing any newly discovered and previously
unavailable evidence, nor does it allege any special cir-
cumstances that would require the Board to reexamine
the decision made in the representation proceeding. We
therefore find that the Respondent has not raised any
representation issue that is properly litigable in this un-
fair labor practice proceeding. See Pittsburgh Plate
Glass Co. v. NLRB, 313 U.S. 146, 162 (1941). Accord-
ingly, we grant the Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times the Respondent, a New York not-
for-profit organization with a principal place of business
located at 1 Pace Plaza, New York, New York, has been
engaged in the provision of higher education.
Annually, the Respondent, in conducting its operations
described above, derives revenues in excess of $1 million
and purchases and receives at its principal place of busi-
ness goods and supplies valued in excess of $50,000 di-
rectly from points located outside the State of New York.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and that New York State United Teachers
(the Union) is a labor organization within the meaning of
Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
A. The Certification
Following the election held October 20, 2005, the Un-
ion was certified on April 12, 2006,1 as the exclusive
collective-bargaining representative of the employees in
the following appropriate unit:
All full-time and regular part-time drivers, lead drivers,
mechanics, and night mechanics employed by the Em-
ployer at its Briarcliff Manor, Pleasantville, and White
Plains locations, excluding all other employees, includ-
ing managers, shift supervisors, and guards, profes-
sional employees and supervisors as defined in the
Act.2
The Union continues to be the exclusive representative
under Section 9(a) of the Act.
B. Refusal to Bargain
On or about April 13, 2006, the Union, by letter, re-
quested that the Respondent recognize and bargain col-
lectively with it as the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit.
On or about May 2, 2006, the Respondent, by letter,
refused to recognize and bargain collectively with the
Union. We find that this refusal constitutes an unlawful
refusal to bargain in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1)
of the Act.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By refusing on and after May 2, 2006, to recognize
and bargain with the Union as the exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of employees in the appropriate
unit, the Respondent has engaged in unfair labor prac-
tices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section
8(a)(5) and (1) and Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.

1 On April 13, 2006, the Board issued a Corrected Decision and Cer-
tification of Representative.
2 The unit description set forth in the complaint did not precisely
mirror the certified unit.
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD2
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has violated Section
8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act, we shall order it to cease and
desist, to bargain on request with the Union and, if an
understanding is reached, to embody the understanding
in a signed agreement.
To ensure that the employees are accorded the services
of their selected bargaining agent for the period provided
by law, we shall construe the initial period of the certifi-
cation as beginning the date the Respondent begins to
bargain in good faith with the Union. Mar-Jac Poultry
Co., 136 NLRB 785 (1962); Lamar Hotel, 140 NLRB
226, 229 (1962), enfd. 328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964), cert.
denied 379 U.S. 817 (1964); and Burnett Construction
Co., 149 NLRB 1419, 1421 (1964), enfd. 350 F.2d 57
(10th Cir. 1965).
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Pace University, New York, New York, its
officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Refusing to recognize and bargain with New York
State United Teachers, as the exclusive bargaining repre-
sentative of the employees in the bargaining unit.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, meet and bargain with the Union as the
exclusive representative of the employees in the follow-
ing appropriate unit on terms and conditions of employ-
ment, and if an understanding is reached, embody the
understanding in a signed agreement:
All full-time and regular part-time drivers, lead drivers,
mechanics, and night mechanics employed by the Em-
ployer at its Briarcliff Manor, Pleasantville, and White
Plains locations, excluding all other employees, includ-
ing managers, shift supervisors, and guards, profes-
sional employees and supervisors as defined in the Act.
(b) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in New York, New York, copies of the at-
tached notice marked “Appendix.”3 Copies of the notice,
on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region
2, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous
places including all places where notices to employees
are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken
by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not al-
tered, defaced, or covered by any other material. In the
event that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the
Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facil-
ity involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall
duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the no-
tice to all current employees and former employees em-
ployed by the Respondent at any time since May 2, 2006.
(c) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we vio-
lated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and obey
this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your bene-
fit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT refuse to recognize and bargain with
New York State United Teachers as the exclusive bar-
gaining representative of the employees in the bargaining
unit.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union and put in
writing and sign any agreement reached on terms and
conditions of employment for our employees in the fol-
lowing bargaining unit:
All full-time and regular part-time drivers, lead drivers,
mechanics, and night mechanics employed by us at our
Briarcliff Manor, Pleasantville, and White Plains loca-
tions, excluding all other employees, including manag-
PACE UNIVERSITY 3
ers, shift supervisors, and guards, professional employ-
ees and supervisors as defined in the Act. PACE UNIVERSITY